Should I Laugh or Cry ?

This is the Young Liberals Vision for Canberra.

 

Private schools caning pupils, the abolition of ACT self-government, licenses for cyclists, a privatised ACTION bus network and minimum sentences for child sex offenders. Is this what life in Canberra would be like if the Young Liberals were in charge? A set of policy proposals to be considered by ACT party members suggests private schools "should be offered the option of disciplining students through corporal punishment, with the use of a cane". It calls for the ACT Government to be stripped of all legal authority until territory voters support a referendum proposal establishing self government.

Message 1 of 14
Latest reply
13 REPLIES 13

Re: Should I Laugh or Cry ?

maybe there is currently no minimum sentence and the YL's are lobbying for a minimum sentence?

Message 11 of 14
Latest reply

Re: Should I Laugh or Cry ?

A set of policy proposals to be considered by ACT party suggests...

..... and says a national sex offenders' register should be established with full public access.


Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/is-this-the-young-liberal-vision-for-canberra-20140601-zrsz...

I think icy is correct. There is no mandatory minimum sentence for child sex offenders in the ACT.

April 2014

A child protection group has urged the ACT to introduce severe measures cracking down on convicted paedophiles, calling for indefinite detention, public access to images of nearby sex offenders, and mandatory minimum sentencing.

Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/bravehearts-wants-indefinite-detention-for-serious-child-se...
Message 12 of 14
Latest reply

Re: Should I Laugh or Cry ?


@grandmoon wrote:

I am more concerned with their wish to "minimum sentences for child sex offenders."

 

 


I think in this instance you are confusing 'minimum' with 'minimal'  I agree it is probably a move to set amandatory  minimum sentence which does not currently exist.

Message 13 of 14
Latest reply

Re: Should I Laugh or Cry ?


@i-need-a-martini wrote:

@*crikey*mate* wrote:

Private schools can already (or should i say still) use the cane in Qld,

 

Legally, they can in public schools too, it is just that Education Queensland has a policy against it, so whilst a teacher may have his employment terminated for using a cane in a public school, "school master" is the actual term in the legislation, for breach of policy, he will not have criminal charges bought against him.


Corporal punishemnt is illegal in all government schools throughout Australia except NT.

 

NSW, ACT, Vic, Tas have blanket bans across ALL schools whether govt or private.

 

Qld, WA and SA are the only states that still allow it in private schools.


1) No, it's not.

 

2) Yes, in both policy and law. (I believe that it is only driven by policy in Vic, not law)

 

3) Policy documents for public schools. It is not law.

 

4) As I was initially referring to only Qld, I will say again, Corporal Punishment is NOT illegal in Queensland, but Policy dictates that it is not to be used in State Schools.

 

If it were illegal, it would not be permissible in some schools and not others.

 

 

 

 


Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
Message 14 of 14
Latest reply