Should childless people be taxed to help families?

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/should-childless-people-be-taxed-to-help-families/story-f...

 

 

"ARE childless Australians community-spirited enough to pay more taxes to enable people with kids to be taxed less, to help support them as they raise the next generation of taxpayers to keep the country going?

It is a controversial proposal, floated today in the US by one childless columnist who was raised by two extremely hardworking middle class parents who battled—as many Australian families do—to cover family costs.

To foster a fairer society and give those who are producing kids a little less excruciating financial pressure, he suggests that child-free people earning more than the median household income (in Australia $57,400 in 2011) should be taxed more heavily, and families should pay around $5000 a year less."

 

 


Are you for or against?

Message 1 of 50
Latest reply
49 REPLIES 49

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?


@lind9650 wrote:

In todays time and age when even teenagers know all about contraceptives, no woman should have children if they can not afford them

 

Erica


What about men?

Message 21 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?


@polksaladallie wrote:

@lyndal1838 wrote:

 

I bought my children up without any help from the government or other tax payers so why should I now have to contribute to anyone else's children. 


I don't think so.


Some things have changed for the better though, haven't they. Before Medicare people were often forced to endure sickness and even die at home with very little assistance from anyone, except family, nobody would suggest that because they had to go through such things, everyone else should.

 

As far as people living beyond their means, can't really put all the blame on young families/people. The banks loan the money and the constant pressure from advertising and lifestyle shows can take some of the responsibility, not to mention the continual barrage of ads for credit cards that weren't available in Australia till sometime in the 70's. House prices compared to wages have also ballooned, 1 years wage was enough to buy a house back in the day - now it's about 5/6 years wages (at least). 

Message 22 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?


@lind9650 wrote:
It was tough at times, but we made do with a lot of things, and besides the morgage we did not owe a penny to anyone. We saved for things we wanted and paid with cash.

 

Today people want to have everything NOW. Maxing out the credit cards before they even get married, having lavish weddings and overseas honeymoons, then getting over their ears into debt with a huge morgage, because a smaller, older place would not do. No wonder people can not manage even if they have good paying jobs. They have not learned to budget and live within their means. Not many young people know how to make do with what they can afford.

 


I just need to pull you up there a little there Erica.  That's a pretty sweeping generalisation you make.  Not all young people today are as you describe.

 

I have three sons in their mid to late 20's early thirties.

 

The eldest undertook a mature age apprentiship a few years ago so is a bit behind the play with regard to property etc.  He lives with his girlfriend in her house which she has a mortage on.  They are saving hard to have an overseas holiday later this year which will all be paid for in advance - not on credit.  As far as I'm aware I don't think they even have a credit card between them.

 

The second lives on the smell of an oily rag (although to be fair I think that suits his personal style - he's an artist), even though he is a third share owner in a successful business.  He has no other debt than is needed in the operation of the business, and is now undertaking further study in his particular field of interest.

 

The youngest got married late last year.  He and his now wife saved and worked incredibly hard to pay for their wedding.  They budgeted extremely well and put on a fantastic "do", all be it with a little help from both sets of parents.  They have a half share in an investment property, with her mother, and are now building their own home.  They would like to start a family but are putting it off until the house is settled and they can afford it.

 

I don't tell you these things to boast about how great my kids are.  In fact they nothing unusual amongst their sets of friends.  They are all just trying to get ahead and I don't think they are living beyond their means.  I think it's a bit unfair to paint all young people as wasteful spend thriths who can't budget.  They can and do.

 

End of Lurkers sermon Woman Happy

_______________________________________________

Creator of the Most Awesome Thread Topic EVER
_______________________________________________
Message 23 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?

AGAINST! Childless couples already pay full tote on tax at the maximum rate because they have ZERO concessions. Mothers get a cash hand out on every child born plus child allowance the whole time that the child grows up and lives at home. Who in Hells name do you think pays for this? THE TAXPAYER ! I spent 50 years paying taxes to subsidise YOUR kids and you want MORE?

 

Message 24 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?

I agree - not so much with the rant - LOL

 

But it is a private decision a couple make whether or not to start a family.

If a couple does not wish to have children so they can live a better style of life they most certainly shouldn't be punished for excercising their freedom of choice.

 

Should then non-drinkers and non-gamblers have to pay extra taxes to help familys who have an alcholic or chronic gamber in their midst?

 

I mean where would you draw the line???

_________________________________________________________

You can't please all the people all the time, so now I just please myself


Message 25 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?

Could you elaborate? your 3 C & P didn't quite cover it all.

Message 26 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?

You are right Lurker - my two children have done well and so far seem to be on the way to securing the path for the future.

 

Growing up with me (single working mum) I think helped them realise the value of money - learn to budget - and Number One - Never spend more than you earn.

 

But it is very tempting to apply for those cards and overdrafts (Just for emergencies.....) then it get's out of hand.

 

Grateful my children have managed without that. 

_________________________________________________________

You can't please all the people all the time, so now I just please myself


Message 27 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?

The first few lines are mine .The c&p is there to read or not .Take from what they wish or not.Whatever it pleases a member to do.

Message 28 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?

All childless couples, she-ele. "What, you have no children? Mrs Smith has 4 - one more than the designated amount - so you can have one of hers, and we'll allocate two more from Mr Jones who has 5 children."  Problem solved. Cat LOL I had two kids[out of wedlock] so I guess I would end up being allocated one more.

 

 

I don't begrudge anyone receiving financial assistance to help with raising children. Times have changed.

 

On the topic of young people have no money sense, I have to disagree. My kids and their friends live within their means and have good money sense. Generational generalities are myopic.

**************************

"There is nothing more; but I want nothing more." Christopher Hitchins
Message 29 of 50
Latest reply

Re: Should childless people be taxed to help families?

what would happen if the children were to die?

Message 30 of 50
Latest reply