Should global warming be a hush topic when there are severe bushfires?

[donnashuggy]

I don't think so, what do others think?

[monman12]

P7,  I still await your simple scientific explanation apropos the imaginary "chemtrails"  and  also HAARP emissions,  but  guess they will not be forthcoming. Meanwhile, as you  are so interested in causes of bush fires (maybe even the probable/actual?) I thought you would find this of interest:

nɥºɾ

[monman12]

P7, I thought this image would excite you somewhat:

nɥºɾ

[fourandsixpants]

Thanks for pic:)....Thank goodness we have these marvellous planes to help put out and contain Australian bush fires

Four Corners  ABC MON 28th Oct 2013 should have interested you http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2013/10/28/3876333.htm

'Fire In The Wire'

(man made 'lightning')

The greatest cause of most damaging bush fires......fire in the wire and prob cause of latest NSW fires.

Ref>" Black Saturday Feb 7th 2009: of total 173 lives lost, 161 identified as death directly caused by powerlines..."

Causes: Power lines, power poles, fuses, clashing conductors/powerlines (in high winds) in high temperatures, birds, falling branches on lines......

similar issue of cause identified in Ash Wednesday Fires 1984

What has/should be done ?

* clear trees

* attach spreaders to pwrlines - to keep them apart esp in high winds, stop them 'swinging' and touching.

* eliminate low voltage conductors

South Australia bod says they have identified benefit and have authority to order 'power off' in high risk times/areas.

......will NSW identify same need ?- or do they see too much of a need to keep makin' $$$$'s by charging for/collecting tariffs for supplied power above the need to keep people, animals and property safe from rampant bush fires?.....we'll see

[jethro_woolfe]

Theres no such thing as the communist plot 'global warming' its a joint effort by the chinese and russians to destabilise our economy and weather. those reds can make it as hot and dry as they like, flood the place or burn it down but we will never give in.

[fourandsixpants]

The USA and Australia and many other countries.....in fact the whole planet is targeted by weather manipulating technology that is in daily use.

[jethro_woolfe]

 well , i won't be giving in to them. the brutes can do what they will,  i'd rather die than do what they want.

[fourandsixpants]

Chemtrailing/chemtrails are not imaginery. They are real. Do your own research, I have posted many links to get you started. H.A.A.R.P was officially closed down in May 2013.....but the same institution and activities taken over by DARPA. Again, do your own research. I am still waiting for you to post your link and reference to your  *pretty* donut/pie chart. You still have not answered my questions (which have since disappeared off this thread??!?) as to what constitutes an "Agricultural Escape"? and....when power poles/lines are deemed the cause of bush fires do these 'accidents' fit into the category of 'lightning' or 'Deliberate'?.....but if you say fit into 'public utilities' then this chart is not truthful, is it?

I ask again.....what is your source and reference for this *pretty very non-specific/generalised donut chart monnie?

[jethro_woolfe]

Most of the charts that particular chap uses are fakes i'd say. run up in some back room full of alarmists and other hoodlums.

[icyfroth]

"monnie"!

[monman12]

P7: "I ask again.....what is your source and reference for this *pretty very non-specific/generalised donut chart monnie?"
"am still waiting for you to post your link and reference to your  *pretty* donut/pie chart."

Wait no longer P7 because here is my source , a reliable one also.:
Australian Bureau of Statistics....1301.0 - Year Book Australia....24.33 CAUSES OF BUSHFIRES IN VICTORIA

Hope that helps you!

P7: "Chemtrailing/chemtrails are not imaginery. They are real. Do your own research.  Absolute nonsense P7, if you want to spray chemicals  on the public you do not do it in full view, and from 30,000+ feet.

Now it is your turn to provide some reliable sources to back up your comments P7. I do not need to do any research,  having had  many years experience in various aeronautical fields,  RAF and civilian, as a pilot and engineer, and  being well aware of this ridiculous imagined conspiracy.

I gather you have little/no scientific background, however I am happy to debate the topic and associated sciences in simple terms directly. Likewise with HAARP, having worked for the Dept of Communications Research and Development Section and having a interest in ionospheric and forward scatter communications, which is the purpose of HAARP


P7: "The USA and Australia and many other countries.....in fact the whole planet is targeted by weather manipulating technology that is in daily use."

Writing nonsense does not make it so P7,  but with all these (your) hair-brained conspiracies how is it possible for them to exist/thrive without any of the very many numerous people necessary to support  them revealing all (apart from the "chemtrails' above your head". Perhaps you are the target?.

Discuss the sciences involved P7, stop quoting nut-sites,  and produce some authoritive references.

nɥºɾ