22-09-2014 08:59 AM - edited 22-09-2014 09:00 AM
on 10-10-2014 09:15 PM
on 10-10-2014 09:30 PM
10-10-2014 09:34 PM - edited 10-10-2014 09:34 PM
I don't know which countries you mean. I can't think of any. Maybe Yemen?
It's the same as for illegal drugs in this country. They are still available to those who know who to ask.
(think . . black-market profiteers)
10-10-2014 09:48 PM - edited 10-10-2014 09:51 PM
on 10-10-2014 10:35 PM
@iapetus_rocks wrote:Just an aside, but no men wear the hijab or the niqab or the buqa or the chador.
Can you explain why that is so?
Muslim men also cover up - long trousers, sleeves and beards. The theory is the same - that all muslims should live and dress 'modestly.'
I should also point out that the word 'modestly' is not about covering flesh. It is about creating privacy. That is the same meaning that Jewish people have.
It's the reason Islamic architecture is designed the way it is with courtyards and screens.
on 10-10-2014 10:41 PM
@am*3 wrote:The Govt doesn't have any intention at present to ban women from wearing a niqab in Australia, bit presumptious to be thinking of suitable penalties/fines (especially the excessive ones posted above)
French fine for wearing niqab in public:
The law imposes a fine of up to €150, and/or participation in citizenship education, for those who violate the law.
Very different.
France is a completely secular country and no religious symbols are allowed from any religion. It has nothing to do with the possibility that some Muslim mum might be holding a plastic sword under her burka.
10-10-2014 10:57 PM - edited 10-10-2014 10:59 PM
France has adopted the policy of banning the blatant wearing of religious symbols in public, citing the reason that France is a secular country.
Now this ban, recent as it is, and affecting all religious symbols from all and any religion, is obviously aimed at Muslim women who wear the hijab or niqab or variants on the theme.
France approached the issue as a few of our current politicians have not.
Suggesting that we ban the burqa for visitors to parliament house was a mistake, when all that was needed was to introduce a ban for attendees who wear any identity-concealing head-wear.
Just as in France, the issue here concerns community unease re the face-concealing Muslim dress forms. So, the restrictive measure concerns all, though it is aimed at a specific group. I think the issue of security concerns is a bit of a red herring.
10-10-2014 11:13 PM - edited 10-10-2014 11:16 PM
10-10-2014 11:26 PM - edited 10-10-2014 11:27 PM
Some cities in England have a very large Muslim population and did you know that there is an effective ban on non-Muslim people even walking through those particular neighborhoods?
It's not a ban enacted by the civil authorities, but it is a ban nonetheless, even if enforced by some very vigilant Mulsims who live there.
One religious group didctating to others (any others) who don't belong to that group, from even visiting certain areas of the UK. it's not an official ban, but defy it at your peril.
So, they complain about our intolerance of burqa-wearers, and yet . . . any thinking person would call this hypocrisy on their part, but it's not hypocrisy; it's an expression of a particular point of view which holds those who disagree, in contempt. That contempt, often being expressed rather violently.
I don't want to that happening in Australia. hmmm, on reflection, I guess there are certain areas even in this country I might not want to visit.
on 10-10-2014 11:27 PM