So where are the Sri Lankans?

These people disappear off the face of the earth and we are given no clue as to whether they are safe or dead or back in India or sent to their death in Sri Lanka?

 

And aside from the ABC and the SMH, there hase been barely a murmur by the Australian public.

 

Have we completely lost our compassion??

Message 1 of 72
Latest reply
71 REPLIES 71

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?

Yes I read that this morning.

 

So we have sent them back to no home, no money. To a country that does not welcome them and will no doubt imprison them. With a president who is increasingly extending his violence - now to Christians and Muslims.

 

This country has lost the plot on humanitarian issues.

 

 

 

 

Message 11 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?

 Lol

Message 12 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?


@polksaladallie wrote:

No thanks, I'd rather do the washing-up.


 Well let me post it here for you then... Then you shall have the answers..... and the fact the majority od Australians are happy that this is happening and our borders are being protected.

 

 

 

First asylum seeker boat returned to country of origin, with Australian navy frigate guiding vessel back to Sri Lanka 

 

THE mystery of at least one of two asylum seeker boats at the centre of a week-long controversy has been solved — all 41 passengers have already arrived safely on their home soil.

 

 

 

In what is the first operation undertaken to return asylum seekers back to their country of origin by boat, an Australian navy frigate acting under border protection command sailed the Sri Lankan group back across the Indian Ocean after immigration officials deemed them to be economic refugees.

 

The operation also marked the first attempt by Sri Lankan asylum seekers to reach Australia since last October.

The Daily Telegraph can now confirm one boat that set sail from Sri Lanka in late June was intercepted by an Australian customs vessel last week.

 

The government has been under siege from refugee advocacy groups, human rights lawyers and some sections of the media since last month, for refusing to comment on or confirm that two boats suspected of carrying up to 200 asylum seekers had made it to Australians waters off Christmas Island. But border protection sources have confirmed ­neither of the boats reached Australia’s maritime zone.

 

The first vessel, containing the 41 asylum seekers, was intercepted well outside Australia’s maritime borders — in the contiguous zone west of Cocos Islands, more than 1000km west of Christmas Island and halfway between Sri Lanka and the Australian mainland.

 

The second suspected ­vessel, reported to be carrying 153 asylum seekers, thought to have set out from India, had also failed to make it into Australia’s maritime territory despite claims it had.

 

All 41 asylum seekers aboard the confirmed vessel were processed at sea in an operation conducted under the enhanced screening policy first introduced by Labor in 2012 to process and return asylum seekers found to be economic refugees to their point of origin.

 

The claim of just one person aboard the vessel was found to be credible. However, he asked to be returned home after being told he would be taken to Manus Island for processing.

 

All are believed to have been transferred yesterday to a Sri Lankan naval vessel off the Sri Lankan Port of Batticaloa yesterday. Officials from the Australian High Commission in Colombo observed the transfer.

 

Immigration sources confirmed 37 of the 41 were Sinhalese, not Tamils, and the transfer had been undertaken in calm seas with no health issues.

 

Immigration minister Scott Morrison confirmed last night that the boat’s passengers had all been safely returned with the co-operation of the Sri Lankan government and that Australia’s international obligations had been met.

 

He would not comment on claims of a second boat.

 

“The Australian government will continue to act in accordance with our international obligations, including applicable international conventions and to protect the safety of life at sea,” Mr Morrison told The Daily Telegraph.

 

“At the same time we will not allow people-smugglers to try and exploit and manipulate Australia’s support of these conventions as a tool to undermine Australia’s strong border protection regime that is stopping the boats and the deaths at sea,” he said.

 

“The government has once again demonstrated our resolve while refusing to be intimidated by the people smugglers, the advocates, Labor and the Greens, who have all been willing the government’s policies to fail. Once again they will be disappointed with our actions today

 

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/first-asylum-seeker-boat-returned-to-country-of-origin-wit...

Message 13 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?

Morrison confirms 41 asylum seekers handed over to Sri Lanka

The Federal Government has confirmed that 41 asylum seekers have been handed over to Sri Lankan authorities after being intercepted near the Cocos Islands.

It is believed that two boats were intercepted north-west of Australia in late June, but the Government was not confirming their existence.

However, Immigration Minister Scott Morrison has now confirmed that one of the boats, intercepted west of the Cocos Islands, was carrying 37 Sinhalese and four Tamils from Sri Lanka.

A statement from the Immigration Minister says the 41 people on board were processed at sea and transferred to the Sri Lankan navy yesterday near Sri Lanka.

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/wa/

Message 14 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?


@nero_wulf wrote:

@polksaladallie wrote:

 

Back to the White Australia policy, obviously.


 

What a load of .........   

 


Do you think for a second that if they were white people from Britain, that they would have been treated the same?

 

Do you think that there would be thousands of white English men, women and children put into shipping containers and tents on Manus and Nauru?

 

Of course it is back to the White Australia policy.

Message 15 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?

whatever 

Message 16 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?

Yet The Daily Telegraph with it's band of poxy so-called 'journalists' manages to track down 'information' that not even a hard nosed credible journalist is able to locate?

 

I don't think so.

 

The Abbott government would save themselves an incredible amount of time (and the country some angst) by simply presenting the facts to start off with.

 

And whilst this boat may haveen scuttled off to Sri Lanka, WHERE is the first boat with 150 odd people? The one that has children and women on it? Where Refugee Groups have confirmed were Tamil refugees from India?

 

Has the the ridiculous Telegraph provided you with this information yet nero? Or are you happy to sit like a mushroom until they deem you and the rest of the country worthy of sharing their, ahem, 'facts'?

Message 17 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?

I for one know the difference between an illegal immigrant and an asylum seeker is.....I also know what protecting our borders is all about.......and I also know what a breach of a legislated policy is my friend.

 

Saying ..." was intercepted well outside Australia’s maritime borders" does not make this action right or humane. I do not support this and I am sure that there are a lot of Australians who feel the same.

Message 18 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?


@nero_wulf wrote:

whatever 


Such insightfullnes lol.

Message 19 of 72
Latest reply

Re: So where are the Sri Lankans?


@nero_wulf wrote:

@polksaladallie wrote:

No thanks, I'd rather do the washing-up.


 Well let me post it here for you then... Then you shall have the answers..... and the fact the majority od Australians are happy that this is happening and our borders are being protected.

 


Any Australians who are happy with this cruel action are odd indeed.

Message 20 of 72
Latest reply