I dont remember reading that in any of the articles, looked like the information wasnt even coming directly from the family involved but passed on through a third party. So I wonder if she wasnt happy was there a process in place for her to complain or request more hours and did she go through this process. Personally I imagine it would be easier for set hours to be allocated rather than having someone available on call for whenever she wanted to go in.
I know the article says a room in the hospital should have been used for dentention, but I imagine that wouldnt be the easiest thing to arrange on short notice and if it meant the hospital then had less beds to offer then I dont agree with that at all.
The revelations come on the eve of the release of what is expected to be two damning reports from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees on conditions on Nauru and Manus Island.
One Immigration source on Christmas Island described how much things had changed since Operation Sovereign Borders began on September 18. ''We have been told that we are not to engage with the clients now,'' she said.
''So the only message we are told to give them is to leave. We are deliberately intimidating them, we are told to tell them Nauru and Manus are full up and so their only and best option is to go home.''
The government on Thursday denied it was using intimidation to force people to return home. It was unapologetic for its treatment of Sri Lankan boat arrivals but did not deny the children were sent home unaccompanied. ''Anyone arriving illegally by boat from Sri Lanka faces a stringent process and anyone who is screened out will go back.''
I don't think it is a different issue at all.
Satisfied me if she was left on Naru?? why would it?
