on โ28-05-2014 02:37 PM
German Magazine Bild has published a picture of Kate Middleton's bare bottom which was exposed as her dress flew up after she alighted from a helicopter during her recent visit to the Blue Mountains in NSW:
German newspaper Bild features the shot on their website along with another picture of Kate in Canada in 2011 when her yellow Jenny Packham dress did exactly the same thing.
Both pictures were taken shortly after she disembarked from a helicopter, with the wind from the propellers causing her dress to blow up.
The photographs have sparked comments online about why Kate doesn't wear weights in her hems like the Queen to avoid future wardrobe mishaps.
One Twitter user wrote: "Why doesn't she weight her hems?"
What I want to know is, why isn't she wearing any underwear?
on โ28-05-2014 02:47 PM
I'm glad I'm not famous, never have to worry about 100 cameras waiting to take a snap of me when I'm at my most vulnerable. Poor girl.
on โ28-05-2014 02:51 PM
wish I had a bum like that *sigh*
on โ28-05-2014 02:52 PM
What I want to know is, why isn't she wearing any underwear?
yes what happened on that helicoptor ride
on โ28-05-2014 02:58 PM
for pity sake, she'd need a battleship weighting down some of the hems in those pleated dresses she wears to stop a helicopter wind from blowing them around.
Sheessh... at least she has a nice bottom, and probably wears g-strings!
on โ28-05-2014 03:06 PM
mmm, gotta hand it to the photographer
on โ28-05-2014 03:17 PM
@*mrgrizz* wrote:What I want to know is, why isn't she wearing any underwear?
yes what happened on that helicoptor ride
@ @ grizz!
โ28-05-2014 03:18 PM - edited โ28-05-2014 03:19 PM
don't believe this .
what happened to your avatar icy?!
on โ28-05-2014 03:25 PM
I updated it.
Why?
on โ28-05-2014 03:27 PM