Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

silverfaun
Community Member

This disgusting swan song from a Green was lauded on here as a milestone and a rival to Gillards misplaced misogyny rant.

 

The people who support this type of hate speech are not indicitive of the wider Australian people and to applaud this type of hate  is appalling.

 

I will stand up to this type of thing and so will the majority of Australians. This person is not fit to be in parliament and he should be rejected wholeheartedly by everyone, which he will be come the WA re election, and good riddance to him and his ilk:

 

 

SPORTING dark suit and speaking in a calm, measured tone, Scott Ludlam is the acceptable face of the Greens.

 

He has spoken out previously against the “people’s revolt” against the carbon tax that sparked the “Ditch the Witch” nastiness.

 

Ludlam’s style is the antithesis of histrionics such as the current appalling rock concert concoctions of a fake prime ministerial beheading.

 

This week the West Australian senator rose to a near-empty chamber and delivered a prepared speech without raising his voice and with no one around to interject. Later, the 7 1/2-minute speech went viral on YouTube, a hit with the young Green Left crowd, attracting 400,000 hits within a few days.

 

But forget the style of the speech; it merely disguised a message that was divisive, vindictive and in the end subversive.

 

“We want our country back,” he said, just six months after a federal election. This is a senator who, with his colleagues, holds the balance of power in the Senate on about 10 per cent of the vote.

 

Yet he told supporters they were somehow disenfranchised.

 

Ludlam spoke of “predator capitalism” and a “murderous horror unfolding on Manus Island” as he launched an attack on the Prime Minister and his government. He suggested Abbott treated WA as a “caricatured redneck backwater” and that it was “kind of revolting” that the Prime Minister consulted with “mining billionaires and media oligarchs on the other side of the world”.

 

Ludlam provided no serious evidence or justification for his slurs. He even talked about Abbott - who I first met 20 years ago through a mutual gay friend and who has been publicly loving and supportive of his gay sister - as “waving (his) homophobia in people’s faces”.

 

We know the Greens are a party of protest but this invective was simply hateful.

 

“Prime Minister,” said Ludlam, “you are welcome to take your heartless and racist exploitation of people’s fears and ram it as far from Western Australia as your taxpayer-funded travel entitlements can take you.”

 

So Ludlam used the Senate to denigrate a freshly elected Prime Minister who is implementing his agenda - to the extent that he isn't blocked by Ludlam’s party - as racist, cynically manipulative, heartless and exploitative.

On what evidence?

 

This vitriol is subversive because it suggests a democratic government has somehow stolen the country. If Ludlam and his supporters want their “country back” surely the way to do it is through fair-minded criticism and a viable alternative.

 

Message 1 of 265
Latest reply
264 REPLIES 264

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

Based on what though?

 

He is against many of those same issues you have been posting that you're against, such as the IPP and CSG.

Message 121 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@freakiness wrote:

Based on what though?

 

He is against many of those same issues you have been posting that you're against, such as the IPP and CSG.


 precisely. ludlam supports things the others wont touch because he isn't 'owned'

its a clear demonstration of the persuasive power of media , he stands up for those issues but he's bagged because andrew says so .

Message 122 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

Maybe his dump speech was the damp dishrag or limp squid? there was next to nobody in  the house to listen to it except his cohort filming it.  All done for the youtube effect..lol

 

This is the type of stunt Greens are well known for, all hyperbole but no fact or substance, the quickie publicity stunt.

 

Message 123 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

not unlike turnbulls speech where he explained his wickedness at launching a new newspaper that wasn't a right wing rag. i think he's tired of the backroom corys who run the agenda. what happened to allow the tea party to take control of the party anyway ?Smiley Happy

Message 124 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@lakeland27 wrote:

not unlike turnbulls speech where he explained his wickedness at launching a new newspaper that wasn't a right wing rag. i think he's tired of the backroom corys who run the agenda. what happened to allow the tea party to take control of the party anyway ?Smiley Happy


or the 20 minute one Turnbull gave to an empty house about his hatchet job on the NBN and posted on youtube.  Or was that covered in the same speech?

Message 125 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@freakiness wrote:

Based on what though?

 

He is against many of those same issues you have been posting that you're against, such as the IPP and CSG.


I sure woulnd't be basing my hopes and aspirations on the betterment for Australia on the likes of what I've seen in the past of the Rudd/Gillar/Rudd administration, thanks freaki.

 

It will be a long time between drinks if I ever place my confidence in that party again, thanks. I think you'll find that's precisely the reason the LNP under Mr Abbott was voted in by the Aus public.

Message 126 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@freakiness wrote:

@lakeland27 wrote:

not unlike turnbulls speech where he explained his wickedness at launching a new newspaper that wasn't a right wing rag. i think he's tired of the backroom corys who run the agenda. what happened to allow the tea party to take control of the party anyway ?Smiley Happy


or the 20 minute one Turnbull gave to an empty house about his hatchet job on the NBN and posted on youtube.  Or was that covered in the same speech?


 he had to sneak in late and explain his launch of the new saturday paper, especially as he described murdoch in a most unflattering light. he was in damage control mode again.

Message 127 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@icyfroth wrote:

@freakiness wrote:

Based on what though?

 

He is against many of those same issues you have been posting that you're against, such as the IPP and CSG.


I sure woulnd't be basing my hopes and aspirations on the betterment for Australia on the likes of what I've seen in the past of the Rudd/Gillar/Rudd administration, thanks freaki.

 

It will be a long time between drinks if I ever place my confidence in that party again, thanks. I think you'll find that's precisely the reason the LNP under Mr Abbott was voted in by the Aus public.


So you'd rather we sign up to the TPP and allow any and all CSG developments whether people affected like it or not?

 

What has Rudd or gillard got to do with the speech Ludlam gave?

Message 128 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

Is Tone's father still around or has he 'died of shame'?
Message 129 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

And where's Margie? In the kitchen, doing the ironing...or has she returned to her labor roots and dumped her hubby?

.
Message 130 of 265
Latest reply