***I will begin by referring to Actual Case Law***
A Landmark Decision by the Supreme Court in 2014 Case found that Director of Housing Staff did NOT follow their own Tenancy Management Manual Policies Nor the appropriate Human Rights Charter Laws at the great disadvantage to those particular Public Tenants.
The Supreme Court also found VCAT's decision to be Wrong on a Question of Law, VCAT's decision was Overturned.
A decision that V/Cat Should have made in favour of the Tenants needed to be taken to the Supreme Court to find Justice.
Lets put the debate to rest and make the facts quite clear, we Tenants have had No choice but to Summon the Director of Housing in Our Tenants Application to V/Cat Five years ago (Four Hearings in same case, V/Cat used two File Numbers to Dilute our Application Case and there were two Biased Senior Members all same case Five years ago, first one Ordered the Dept.of Housing to carry out the Consumer Affairs repairs 2011 report Storm damages and such which are INSURED and would Not have cost the Dept.of Housing a Cent, Yet this Consumer Affairs 2011 Order (Even though the Senior Member said that we knew our Case well), Consumer Affairs 2011 Order was Completely Left out of the Final V/Cat Written reasons and also our Vital evidence and Videos, and our Facts were completely Misinterpreted by the Biased Member example he stated Gaping Hole finally filled after days instead of Three and Half Years. Also these Members Don’t allow you to Question the Dept.of Housing staff, and also suppressed our S.E.S. evidence and Our Roof Plumbers report evidence V/Cat taps the Director on the hand and stated the Director of Housing could have done things better.
Now in our NEW Tenants Application to V/Cat case for Maladministration of the Director of Housing and also Reduction in ALL Essential Services Director breaching RTA Laws 43 and 45, 67, 68 and Many others. V/Cat on three occassion have tried to keep our submissions out of our V/cat file so the presiding member cant read them.
This Reduction in ALL services has occurred after we made Complaints to Vic.Ombudsman about two problem Managers first one for taking Thirty Six Weeks to assess our Rental Rebate application instead of the normal two weeks. and we also made a complaint to Vic.Ombudsman about another Manager, alos because We Took the Director of Housing to V/Cat Five Years ago, they have both found any opportunity to make our lives difficult, example of Reduction in All Services, No Automatic Rental Statements, Refusing to provide a Rental Account Reconciliation Never received, No responses to our Rental queries example," has the Dept.of Housing increased our weekly Rental"? No responses from anyone keeping us in the dark.
No Programmed works in Fifteen Years which means Carpets Fifteen Years old and worn, No interior or exterior painting, etc. Our Plumber confirms the fifteen year Old rusted stove had Multiple Faults which we reported to the Dept.of Housing and to V/Cat FIVE years ago at the SITE hearing we pointed out to the Senior Member and to the Dept.of Housing standing there "Look when we turn on an element the flames on the other ones Reduce Low etc. which took longer to do our cooking, BUT the Senior Member swept this aside and said that the Dept.of Housing Plumber serviced the Gas Stove in June,2011, FAST TRACK Five years to CURRENT Day and we have Our Plumbers Report which describes the Multiple Faults that the fifteen Year old Gas Stove had when one element turned on the other goes off, our Plumbers report also found that there were Two Kinked Stove Gas copper floor pipe and kinked oven hose at the back of the oven which the Dept.of Housing plumber would have noticed Five Years ago but did Nothing, also signs of overheating on side of old stove so we replaced both Multiple Faults Old Toilet and Old Multiple faults Gas stove and we have requested and are waiting for Reimbursement from the Director.
**VCAT have also have decided to place the very Same Biased Corrupt Senior Member on our New Tenants Application Case which we have requested Recuse Disqualify himself for being Biased yet he wants to remain on the case.
**By the way, On Three occasions now VCAT have found excuses NOT to place our NEW Tenants Application to VCAT Submissions (Six Handwritten Letters) All Forms Centrelink letter Etc from our File Preventing the presiding Member from reading our Submissions which include all the Facts and they are aware we have Photos and Videos.
What you have written in your reply proves you know Nothing about our NEW Tenants Application to V/Cat case against the Director of Housing for Maladministration and Reduction in ALL Essential Services breaching RTA Laws 43 and 45 as well as many others.
Your vague statement regarding VCAT and Vic Ombudsman is unsubstantiated and has No substance. Have you personally overseen each of the Thousands of cases handled by these agencies? We doubt that.
********Truth and Facts speak Louder than mindless assumptions********
mariem888
