on 05-11-2013 02:05 PM
With the real likelihood that WA will have to go to the polls again to vote for the senate.
Should they allow people or parties that didn't stand before to stand this time. ??
on 05-11-2013 08:57 PM
@topsidesoul wrote:Heard some talkback radio callers demanding that only those whose votes were lost should be forced to revote.....that is WA in a nutshell.
I think it says more about people who call talk-back radio LOL
on 07-11-2013 01:03 AM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@topsidesoul wrote:Heard some talkback radio callers demanding that only those whose votes were lost should be forced to revote.....that is WA in a nutshell.
I think it says more about people who call talk-back radio LOL
They probably post regularly on political threads on chat boards also LOL
Both seem addictive to some
07-11-2013 01:27 AM - edited 07-11-2013 01:28 AM
. HB pencil-marks lend themselves to alteration as do votes by electronic media (hack the system and change the votes)
. We all know what happened in the USA with chads (punched or partially punched? that is the question)
. Thumbprints have the potential to identify us, and leave nasty purple stains into the bargain.
. Ballpoint pens seem the way to go, until one realises that all of our politicians are conniving, scheming, two-faced bustards and none of them are to be trusted because they are only interested in their personal advancement and the mark they might leave in the history books.
. So, vote "None of the Above" and elucidate the crisis of confidence that we have in our wedding-attending, sports-event-subsidised, over-superannuated, cab-charging, representatives of those who contributed to their campaign funds; people who bare-facedly dare to stand up and say that they have our best interests at heart, when they give the lie to that with their every passing breath.