We Don't Want You Back!

 

Australia PM rules out leniency for ex-jihadists

 

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has ruled out any leniency for returning jihadists following reports that three of its nationals suspected of fighting with Islamic State were in secret negotiations with Canberra to come home.

 

The Australian newspaper said the three had approached authorities via intermediaries or family members, but that the talks were stalled over what punishment they would face and fears of the risk they might pose if they were reissued passports and allowed to return.

 

The news has sparked a fierce debate in Australia about whether or not to allow those who have left the country to fight with ISIS or other groups to return. The public and the government appear to be in lockstep in their opposition to the idea.

 

A lawyer representing one of the three Australian men told Fairfax radio that his client, an Australian-born convert to Islam, was prepared to face the full force of the law and wanted to use his experience to discourage would-be jihadists from joining the terror group.

 

 Rob Stary said if he were capable of rehabilitation, "then we should utilise him, we should at least engage in the discussion, but the shutters have been put up by the (Australian Federal Police)".

 

Entire Article Here

 

Oh he wants to use his experience to counsel would-be-jihadists against joining ISIL, does he?

 

How do we know he's not a Trojan Horse and instead is instructed to recruit fresh meat?

Message 1 of 59
Latest reply
58 REPLIES 58

Re: We Don't Want You Back!

That's all very well to cancel visas but what about the boys who are Australian citizens?
Message 51 of 59
Latest reply

Re: We Don't Want You Back!


@rabbitearbandicoot wrote:

It would be very silly to think that all these boys are totally innocent. Even if just ONE of them is an ISIS plant, who knows what damage  that ONE could do. I dread to think If they are all plants ???


Who said any of them were totally innocent?

Message 52 of 59
Latest reply

Re: We Don't Want You Back!

on another thread you blamed our pm -

so what exactly are they guilty of?

 

 

Message 53 of 59
Latest reply

Re: We Don't Want You Back!


@*julia*2010 wrote:

on another thread you blamed our pm -

so what exactly are they guilty of?

 

 


That's utter rubbish. I did not blame the PM.

Message 54 of 59
Latest reply

Re: We Don't Want You Back!

yes you did.  

 

re terror threats in australia

 

 

Who's making excuses for them?

The fact is we have not had a terrorist attack in Australia in years.

 

If our idiot PM would only stop taunting and daring them we might not ever have one here.

 

 

 

the reason we have not had a terrorist attack 

in australia for years - is because our authorities

stopped them.

 

http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/Securityandyourcommunity/Pages/FoiledAustralianattacks.aspx

 

 

so - if the australian jihadists are not totally

innocent - what are they guilty of?

 

Message 55 of 59
Latest reply

Re: We Don't Want You Back!


@*julia*2010 wrote:

so - if the australian jihadists are not totally

innocent - what are they guilty of?

 


Bad judgement, trusting somebody who they should not have trusted.  Once they got to Syria or Iraq some may have done some terrible things, some may have just witnessed atrocities.  Most probably engaged in some battles with Syrian or Iragi forces, fired some shots, experienced missiles exploding near by, saw some injured and dead or dying people, and found out that it is not the fun they thought it would be, and that death on the battle field is not something heroic and noble.  Who knows what happened, therefore, if any of them manages to get out of there they should be dealt with on individual basis.  Then given good spanking, banned from using internet, and watched by the authorities.  One of those tracking bracelets would be a good idea.

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” .
Message 56 of 59
Latest reply

Re: We Don't Want You Back!


@***super_nova*** wrote:

@*julia*2010 wrote:

so - if the australian jihadists are not totally

innocent - what are they guilty of?

 


Bad judgement, trusting somebody who they should not have trusted.  Once they got to Syria or Iraq some may have done some terrible things, some may have just witnessed atrocities.  Most probably engaged in some battles with Syrian or Iragi forces, fired some shots, experienced missiles exploding near by, saw some injured and dead or dying people, and found out that it is not the fun they thought it would be, and that death on the battle field is not something heroic and noble.  Who knows what happened, therefore, if any of them manages to get out of there they should be dealt with on individual basis.  Then given good spanking, banned from using internet, and watched by the authorities.  One of those tracking bracelets would be a good idea.


Which make them deserters. Deserters are not viewed with fondness by any army. In fact they were summarily shot in some cases.

An army like ISIS with the archaic morals they have would have no qualms in beheading them.

Message 57 of 59
Latest reply

Re: We Don't Want You Back!


@***super_nova*** wrote:

@*julia*2010 wrote:

so - if the australian jihadists are not totally

innocent - what are they guilty of?

 


Bad judgement, trusting somebody who they should not have trusted.  Once they got to Syria or Iraq some may have done some terrible things, some may have just witnessed atrocities.  Most probably engaged in some battles with Syrian or Iragi forces, fired some shots, experienced missiles exploding near by, saw some injured and dead or dying people, and found out that it is not the fun they thought it would be, and that death on the battle field is not something heroic and noble.  Who knows what happened, therefore, if any of them manages to get out of there they should be dealt with on individual basis.  Then given good spanking, banned from using internet, and watched by the authorities.  One of those tracking bracelets would be a good idea.


what???  that's a pretty harsh penalty for

bad judgement   Smiley Sad

 

 

 

Message 58 of 59
Latest reply

Re: We Don't Want You Back!


@*julia*2010 wrote:

@***super_nova*** wrote:

@*julia*2010 wrote:

so - if the australian jihadists are not totally

innocent - what are they guilty of?

 


Bad judgement, trusting somebody who they should not have trusted.  Once they got to Syria or Iraq some may have done some terrible things, some may have just witnessed atrocities.  Most probably engaged in some battles with Syrian or Iragi forces, fired some shots, experienced missiles exploding near by, saw some injured and dead or dying people, and found out that it is not the fun they thought it would be, and that death on the battle field is not something heroic and noble.  Who knows what happened, therefore, if any of them manages to get out of there they should be dealt with on individual basis.  Then given good spanking, banned from using internet, and watched by the authorities.  One of those tracking bracelets would be a good idea.


what???  that's a pretty harsh penalty for

bad judgement   Smiley Sad

 

Cat LOLMan LOLRobot LOLSmiley LOLWoman LOL

The coveted five laughy-face award

 

 


A lot of the  Aussie boys that went to Gallipoli got death.

Message 59 of 59
Latest reply