on 25-02-2015 08:46 PM
I am amazed and disgusted that in all the indignation over what Gillian Triggs should or shouldn't have done or who said or didn't say what to her, not ONE SINGLE POLITICIAN except, finally, Malcolm Turnbull, has commented in any way on the contents of her report..
She found that over a 15-month period from January 2013 to March 2014, spanning both the Labor and Coalition governments there were 233 recorded assaults involving children and 33 incidents of reported sexual assault.
If these findings are true - and as far as I know nobody has so far disputed them - then what is going to be done about it? Who had the duty of care? who is going to be held responsible. What measures are going to be put in place to stop this abuse happening in future?
Both Gillian Triggs and George Brandis are astute and comparitively wealthy adults able to instruct top legal practitioners to protect their reputaions - but who is going to protect the safety of these children? How many more children have been abused since March 2014? Is a child perhaps being abused in a detention centre even while you are reading this post?
Surely to goodness after all that was learned from the Children In Care Royal Commission this report cannot simply be put in a "don't want to know" basket while both sides of Pariament try to gain political mileage out the motives of the Human Rghts Commissioner or the behaviour of the Attourney General.
At some point -though probably not in the lifetime of this government or even the one that follows it - there will inevitably be a Royal Commission into the treatment of children in detention centre. what do you imagine its findings are likely to be?
on 26-02-2015 01:26 PM
this is not addressed to anyone in particular, but in the light of some comments made about the time span covered in the report and suggestions that it should have gone back to the early years of the first Rudd govenrnment it has occurred to me to ask "why stop there" if abuse on that scale happened over the twleve month period covered by the report, then it is logical to assume it must have been happening ever since the first detention centres were set up to house vietnamese boat people.t
I remember a Current Affairs programme (possibly 4 Corners) that aired many years ago (possibly as many as 10 - the years fly by rather quickly once you reach my age - where serious allegations were made by medical staff of the sexual abuse of young boys in a detention centre in Australia. Official denials were issued and the whole affair was quickly forgotten, but now one has to wonder.
The truth is nobody and no party can legitimately claim the high moral ground in this matter.
26-02-2015 01:38 PM - edited 26-02-2015 01:38 PM
The HRC has released reports and been investigating the issue over the years. It's just that abbott is the first who has openly abused the messenger to such an extent to mislead the public into thinking this is the first and only report and that it's all about picking on big sooky la la, bully boy, him.
https://www.humanrights.gov.au/index-commissions-work
on 26-02-2015 01:40 PM
He should have just binned the report and got on with life.
It's not like he is going to do anything about it.
Glee,
I am still waiting for an answer
on 26-02-2015 01:47 PM
on 26-02-2015 01:49 PM
Deb
What did you think of my idea / Solution ?
on 26-02-2015 01:50 PM
on 26-02-2015 01:52 PM
It gets them out of detention.
Isn't that what you want ?
on 26-02-2015 01:53 PM
on 26-02-2015 01:55 PM
on 26-02-2015 01:57 PM
@debra9275 wrote:
What did I think?
Typical
what does that mean?
do you agree with the idea?
why? why not?