on 31-12-2013 03:04 PM
Does it even exist?
Is this government website lying to us?
http://www.climatechange.gov.au/greenhouse-effect
They even have a link to understanding climate change lol
http://www.climatechange.gov.au/climate-change/climate-science/understanding-climate-change
on 31-12-2013 03:10 PM
on 31-12-2013 03:13 PM
on 31-12-2013 03:13 PM
.
It's like asking how Santa Claus can deliver presents to 8 billion people in one night
Or like asking where all the fallen teeth went before the Tooth Fairy was invented
Like asking how the Old Woman could raise and feed so many children when all they had to live in was a shoe
Maybe the OP's question should be referred to those who know how waving a wand created a glass-carriage for Cinderella
Or perhaps the German government could explain why despite their arduous efforts to 'cure' the hoax of climate-change, they didn't manage to reduce the fake climate-change one iota
Better still, maybe Al Gore could answer the OP's question
and while he's at it, perhaps he will explain why the hoax of 'global warming' switched it's name to 'climate change' after it was proved beyond doubt that 'global warming' was a flop
on 31-12-2013 03:15 PM
on 31-12-2013 03:18 PM
.
.
If the prawns in our government dared to remove the fake 'greenhouse' lies
we'd very likely be subjected to a catastropic tsunami
or 'terrorist' attacks
or the destruction of the Sydney Harbour Bridge
or a laboratory-created 'plague'
or even MORE Chemtrail toxins
or 'accidental' overdoses of fluoride in our drinking water
or the 'mysterious explosion' of a plane filled with our Olympic athletes
Our politicians don't dare
Big money is at stake
and insane psychopaths hold guns to the heads of all governments who even threaten to expose the lies
on 31-12-2013 03:44 PM
The government didn't waste much time axing the Climate Commission and Tim Flannery..
...that still makes me giggle..
.........
on 31-12-2013 03:58 PM
Does not sound hysterical at all:
"Understanding climate change
Our climate is changing, largely due to the observed increases in human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas), agriculture and land clearing. Changes over the 20th century include increases in global average air and ocean temperature, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global sea levels. The extra heat in the climate system has other impacts such as affecting atmospheric and ocean circulation, which influences rainfall and wind patterns.
Another serious impact of the increasing concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide is ocean acidification. Around a quarter of the carbon dioxide produced by humans is absorbed by the oceans. As the carbon dioxide dissolves in sea water it forms a weak carbonic acid, making the ocean more acidic. There are early indications that some marine organisms are already being affected by ocean acidification.
The global average air temperature has increased by around 0.85 degrees Celsius since 1880.[i] The observed increase in temperatures has occurred across the globe, with rising temperatures recorded on all continents and in the oceans. World Meteorological Organization records show that the decade of 2001-10 was the world’s warmest decade on record, and that the 2000s were warmer than the 1990s which in turn were warmer than the 1980s. In Australia, average air temperatures have increased by around 0.9 degrees Celsius since 1910, and each decade has been warmer than the previous decade since the 1950s.[ii]
Scientists agree that the worst effects of climate change can largely be avoided if carbon dioxide emissions are reduced to an acceptable level."
on 31-12-2013 04:05 PM
DY: "Does it even exist"
It is very basic physics DY, and in this context atmospheric physics. So I presume you are bored and dug up something that which you know little about, and will now attempt to blame it on the Libs, or better still as a direct result of the acoustic/mechanical/thermal shock-wave resulting from Abbott punching a wall some decades ago.
PC58: "and while he's at it, perhaps he will explain why the hoax of 'global warming' switched it's name to 'climate change' after it was proved beyond doubt that 'global warming' was a flop"
I see you also have no concept of the "Scientific Method" i.e. "proved beyond doubt that 'global warming' was a flop", what does that mean when scientific data proves otherwise?
The change in terminology is because whilst there has been a steady rise (and increasing rate) in CO2 levels and also global temperatures over many decades, both are easily measured as single entities, climate involves many interacting variables.
It has only by many observations and research based upon the fact that climate is dependant on temperature, that a hypothesis has evolved linking GHG with global climatic conditions. This hypothesis is now accepted by a majority of scientists and scientific bodies world wide, thus the term climate change is now used instead of global warming , the step being accepted as obvious!
nɥºɾ
on 31-12-2013 04:08 PM