What is Scott going to do

martinw-48
Community Member
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-26/scott-morrison-us-trump-xi-china-trade-war-damage/11246486?pf...

Maybe he could try wearing different baseball caps until the problem is solved.
It won him the election.
Surely it can fix any problem
Message 1 of 64
Latest reply
63 REPLIES 63

Re: What is Scott going to do

I think there has to be a middle way.

On other forums, I was told I was sitting on the fence on this issue, but I don't believe so.

 

The facts as I see them are

-in our society everyone needs some money to survive. For food, a roof over their head, for clothing.

 

-How much money though is the most important factor. For some people, it might be all they focus on, to the exclusion of other things, even ethics. But there is a middle ground, where most people would like to be, and that is where they feel reasonably safe and secure. Maybe not wealthy but without endless stress about bills and so on.

 

-We do need to reward individual effort in our society. That has always been the case. Those who do work hard need to see some results for their effort.

 

-But not all efforts are rewarded equally. For instance, some movie stars, sports stars, CEO's etc are paid massive amounts of money, more than any rocket scientist. Many people on average incomes might work just as hard but for less result. So although usually more effort means more reward, it isn't 100% even, never has been in society.

 

- some people in our society are unable to adequately support themselves. This may be because of illness, accident, old age etc and they haven't always got family who can help them. There has to be a safety net to support them.

 

My own feelings are we need a society where there is a lot of freedom (not a socialist society) and where people are rewarded for effort.

But our government needs at the same time to make it a fair society, where everyone pays their proper share of tax. And where no one is left behind.

There will always be a spread of incomes, spread of abilities, spread of differences between people and what they want out of life, but the important thing is to have a smaller spread & not too huge a gap between workers. I think if most people feel they have a fair chance, it makes for a happier society.

 

Unfortunately I think we are seeing the gap between poor and wealthy widen.

Message 51 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do


@chameleon54 wrote:

lyhagr_0 unable to think of any suitable response except more LOL's .... That's a first.

 

 

Oh I have plenty of responses for you, none of the printable in this forum   ..... And YES I do lol quite a bit at your posts

 

 

 

 

 

 

Message 52 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do

Look at this. Four of the top 6 would be viewed by many as having socialist policies. I might add that most if not all have had to bear the brunt of the GFC and the resulting recession unlike Australia. Norway by the way has a sovereign fund of over $1 trillion dollars. Where's ours?
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/quality-of-life-rankings
Message 53 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do


@martinw-48 wrote:
Wow.
So only if money is made is effort achieved.
Not everyone needs a financial reward to do something
Some people actually do stuff just to feel good
Or woe forbid for personal esteem
Then there are the true patriots that do stuff for the betterment of the country and society
Although there are less and less of those nowadays just look at the figures of volunteers
We have more in common than you might think. I agree with everything above......Man Happy

Chamo, you completely ignore the fact that the reason no Socialist state has succeeded is because of the greedy people that float to the top and steal from their citizens.
No I don't ignore it. I just think that is the second greatest reason socialism always fails. The first reason being that human nature dictates that most people will only work harder and smarter than some-one else if they see some reward for their effort. While there are always exception to any rule, we see that with no reward, humans tend to become lazy loafers, bludging.off of other peoples efforts.  Human existence then becomes a race to the bottom of mundane, mediocraty.
We have already seen this attitude of boring mediocraty expressed on this thread by some other posters who regularly post in support of Labor / Socialist ideals..  And if we want to see the socialist philosophy of all men are equal but some more equal than others,  played out in Australia we only have to look at how the current Labor party has been completely taken over by self serving, self interested union hacks.

And therefore is the crux of the problem.
The greedy.
You go for it mate.
Get what you want.
Build that dynasty.
Its not about building a dynasty. I have had plenty of times in my life when I haven't had money to buy food or pay basic bills and being self employed, there was no government hand outs to make it all better. It aint fun. All I am trying to do by working is provide some security for my family and help my kids get started in a difficult climate for young people.

But don't for one minute make out it is the right thing to do.
See above and then please explain why that is not " the right thing to do ".

Humans have lived on this planet for millions of years without money.

In the stone age. For better or worse, humans no longer live a stone age existence and harping back to that time will not change the here and now. Society is a bit like ebay. It has plenty of faults, but that is the system we have to work in.

We can do it again but it requires intelligence.
True intelligence not the faux intelligence of wealth.
Also the belief that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few

 

Message 54 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do


@springyzone wrote:

I think there has to be a middle way.

On other forums, I was told I was sitting on the fence on this issue, but I don't believe so.

 

The facts as I see them are

-in our society everyone needs some money to survive. For food, a roof over their head, for clothing.

 

-How much money though is the most important factor. For some people, it might be all they focus on, to the exclusion of other things, even ethics. But there is a middle ground, where most people would like to be, and that is where they feel reasonably safe and secure. Maybe not wealthy but without endless stress about bills and so on.

 

-We do need to reward individual effort in our society. That has always been the case. Those who do work hard need to see some results for their effort.

 

-But not all efforts are rewarded equally. For instance, some movie stars, sports stars, CEO's etc are paid massive amounts of money, more than any rocket scientist. Many people on average incomes might work just as hard but for less result. So although usually more effort means more reward, it isn't 100% even, never has been in society.

 

- some people in our society are unable to adequately support themselves. This may be because of illness, accident, old age etc and they haven't always got family who can help them. There has to be a safety net to support them.

 

My own feelings are we need a society where there is a lot of freedom (not a socialist society) and where people are rewarded for effort.

But our government needs at the same time to make it a fair society, where everyone pays their proper share of tax. And where no one is left behind.

There will always be a spread of incomes, spread of abilities, spread of differences between people and what they want out of life, but the important thing is to have a smaller spread & not too huge a gap between workers. I think if most people feel they have a fair chance, it makes for a happier society.

 

Unfortunately I think we are seeing the gap between poor and wealthy widen.


Excellent post springy and expresses my views to a Tee.

Message 55 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do

we have in this country a large group of citizens who have no choice but to live of a pitence and are told stop complaing you have it so good

pentioners, the unemployed and the disabled. the homeless are even worse off.

 

in this day n age (my fav term ever) the rest of society mostly dont care all that much about these people.

 

all the unemployed are just bludging is the message from govt.

pentioners are all living in million dollar homes is the message from govt

the disabled now have the Disability insurance scheme so they are laughing is the message from govt

and the homeless are there by choice is the message from govt.

 

so we dont need to hear all the sob storys as the govt is taking really good care of these unfortunates.

 

right?

Message 56 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do

 

Springyzone, I too agree with your opinions. However, IMO they are idealistic and neither the Labor or Liberal party will ever introduce a system that results in an Australia as you have described. Both parties rely heavily on their affiliations, support and donations etc. The Liberal reputation is linked more to the higher classes and wealthy while the Labor Party are linked more so to the working classes and unions. Politicians are driven by the policies of their party and they must support the policies or be booted out. There is no room in a political party for a rogue.

 

So again IMO, there will never be a 'fair' middle ground while politics operates as it does in our country. If Labor or Liberal were perceived to abandon their most loyal followers, and possibly the party principles, then the public reaction would amount to political suicide. The only solution I could imagine would be an alternative party, or a very special person in the PM position. And I don't know of any party or any person who would fit the bill.

Message 57 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do


@davidc4430 wrote:

we have in this country a large group of citizens who have no choice but to live of a pitence and are told stop complaing you have it so good

pentioners, the unemployed and the disabled. the homeless are even worse off.

 

in this day n age (my fav term ever) the rest of society mostly dont care all that much about these people.

 

all the unemployed are just bludging is the message from govt.

pentioners are all living in million dollar homes is the message from govt

the disabled now have the Disability insurance scheme so they are laughing is the message from govt

and the homeless are there by choice is the message from govt.

 

so we dont need to hear all the sob storys as the govt is taking really good care of these unfortunates.

 

right?


My views on this are on the record and haven't changed. There are many genuine people who a compassionate society should just automatically assist as a matter of course. This includes the elderly, genuinely unemployed ( and yes there are plenty of people who want to work but cant find a job, ) single parents trying to bring up little kids on their own and those with physical or mental health problems. Not only should they have a right to community assistance, society should not stigmatise these people the way it sometimes does at present.

 

The thing that is often forgotten in this debate is that every-one of us is only a second away from relying on social support due to an accident, car crash or illness. Everything else aside it is good personal insurance to ensure society and government have adequate support structures in place, regardless of ones political views.  .

 

This is a separate issue to the merits or otherwise of socialist philosophy which in its purest form dictates that everyone should receive equal share of community wealth and peoples lives, work and home should be completely controlled by the state. As already stated, socialist policy always fails because there is no incentive to strive or achieve to the best of ones ability. It becomes a race to the bottom of bland, boring nothingness. .

 

Aside from the fact that it simply does not work, I don't want my life controlled by the state, living in a cookie cutter house in a cookie cutter street and going to work each day in a cookie cutter bus to a cookie cutter factory to make cookies. ie. the mundane monotony of socialism.

 

I want to live as I please, truly experience life, enjoy the privacy of my own little slice of heaven, dream of what might be possible, do the best I can at what i,m doing ( now there's a quaint idea foreign to many socialists....Man Happy   ) , help my kids, family and  wider community and then retire without the government dictating my every thought and action. Basically I choose personal freedom rather than state control.

Message 58 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do


@not_for_sale2025 wrote:

 

Springyzone, I too agree with your opinions. However, IMO they are idealistic and neither the Labor or Liberal party will ever introduce a system that results in an Australia as you have described. Both parties rely heavily on their affiliations, support and donations etc. The Liberal reputation is linked more to the higher classes and wealthy while the Labor Party are linked more so to the working classes and unions. Politicians are driven by the policies of their party and they must support the policies or be booted out. There is no room in a political party for a rogue.

 

So again IMO, there will never be a 'fair' middle ground while politics operates as it does in our country. If Labor or Liberal were perceived to abandon their most loyal followers, and possibly the party principles, then the public reaction would amount to political suicide. The only solution I could imagine would be an alternative party, or a very special person in the PM position. And I don't know of any party or any person who would fit the bill.


@ Not for sale,

 

I think at a federal level your post is entirely correct, which is why it is so important that we have the political cycle currently operating in Australian politics. ie. The Liberals run tighter budgets, restoring financial health to the economy, but in the process go too far on encouraging capatalism at the expense of social policy.

 

Eventually Labor gets into power and ( in the past at least ) restores some balance to social policy, but trashes the economy as a result of increased spending on social policy while bashing business and self employed. This reduces incentive and income potential, dampening down potential state income.

 

The really big problem we have at the moment is that currently Labor seem to have forgotten all about its constituancy and is not much better at supporting its traditional support base than the Liberals. I suspect most thinking voters have recognised this and this contributed to Labors abysmal results at the last election.

 

In South Australia we have seen a Liberal government elected after 16 years of Labor rule. This particular Liberal government has just released its second budget which revolves around supporting people and constituancies that one would normally associate with Labor. The cynic would suggest it is just a clever political move to keep Labor out of office for years and while that may well be some of the motivation, I suspect the new Liberal Government can see that education, health and social housing have been badly neglected by the previous Labor government and are the areas of highest need in the state at the moment.

 

It appears they truly are governing for all people. It will be interesting to see how they are judged by voters at the next election. They appear to be genuinely commanding the middle ground of politics. in a way we have not seen from either major party for a very long time.

Message 59 of 64
Latest reply

Re: What is Scott going to do

martinw-48
Community Member
Sounds like political spin to me.
South Australian Liberal government promised to return eight 100 k zones to 110 k.
Hasn't been done.
Just a vote winning lie as far as I'm concerned.
Maybe it's one of those Liberal non core promises.
Can't be difficult.
Just change some signs.
Unless government for all is just words and no action.
I don't live in South Australia so I don't know all the promises that haven't been kept but every time I drive to Adelaide I have a good laugh at the fact that one promise that is so easy to do hasn't been done
Message 60 of 64
Latest reply