You are so right Pepe.
The priest implied that Jill Meagher lacked faith in God (and who knows whether she believed in God or not) and he plucked her name from a paper to make an example of her and waved in front of the children and staff. It doesn't matter where or who was there, it makes no difference to his shocking attitude at the time.
Jill Meagher was someone he had never met, didn't know, and had no idea of the circumstances, which he freely admitted himself in the interview.
Time for those who insist on blaming the victim to stop it.
There is an enormous difference between teaching children the dangers of stranger danger in the dark or daylight, and accusing a victim as an adult of being complicit (by implication) in her own murder.
You have posted to yourself so if you are asking me (?) what my reaction to that is, I don't have one right now. It's going to be a wait and see what happens game I suspect.
It's going to be a long and complicated matter, one that might drag on for years with suits, countersuits and a dog eat dog long drawn out situation where the only winners just might be the lawyers.
The laws have to change, but that alone will never stop killers killing, on parole or otherwise ... 
As for money, nothing will ever bring their loved ones back, and it's most likely not really about 'money' anyway, so no comment.
