What's the evolutionary explanation for cougars and younger men?

[the_bob_delusion]

Go. 

[icyfroth]

---

@imastawka wrote:

Spoiler

      

                 

---

I think you've got a bloody hide posting my picture in there, Stawks! I see it as a personal attack and I've told the Mods about it! I think you owe me an apology! A simple "I'm sorry, Icy" will suffice.

You too, Helen.

[cmcoins2000]

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@imastawka wrote:

Spoiler

      

                 

---

I think you've got a bloody hide posting my picture in there, Stawks! I see it as a personal attack and I've told the Mods about it! I think you owe me an apology! A simple "I'm sorry, Icy" will suffice.

You too, Helen.

---

Good morning Icy.

As this is my first post on this thread - I am not exactly sure - what it is that needs an apology.

[the_bob_delusion]

Yeah, I didn't think it was kosher to put your photo up. 

[icyfroth]

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@vicr3000 wrote:
Doesn't stop them enjoying the activity though, does it ?
Sex doesnt stop just because you are past producing.

And you also have the feel good factor of walking around with a younger thing on your arm.
Male or female.

---

Well, my question is why is there a survival advantage or what is it in nature that selected out younger men and older women?

---

In answer to that, Bob - I don't know what your on about when you say "evoltionary explanation" to a relationship between an older woman (past her prime) and a much younger man.

There is no evolutionary advantage. If it were normal and general practice, the human race would soon die out.

Not so with older men and younger women. Although I believe the dna from an old man's sperm as against a young man's is inferior. Be that as it may.

So a large age gap between a man and a woman is not normal and not desirable.

There are, however, certain circumstances and conditions where such a relationship works and works well for all concerned.

Sex is the least part of it.

[icyfroth]

---

@cmcoins2000 wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@imastawka wrote:

Spoiler

      

                 

---

I think you've got a bloody hide posting my picture in there, Stawks! I see it as a personal attack and I've told the Mods about it! I think you owe me an apology! A simple "I'm sorry, Icy" will suffice.

You too, Helen.

---

Good morning Icy.

As this is my first post on this thread - I am not exactly sure - what it is that needs an apology.

---

Your pat on the back to Stawka for posting my picture in that spoiler. Thank you. Shows very poor judgement on your part.

[the_bob_delusion]

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@vicr3000 wrote:
Doesn't stop them enjoying the activity though, does it ?
Sex doesnt stop just because you are past producing.

And you also have the feel good factor of walking around with a younger thing on your arm.
Male or female.

---

Well, my question is why is there a survival advantage or what is it in nature that selected out younger men and older women?

---

In answer to that, Bob - I don't know what your on about when you say "evoltionary explanation" to a relationship between an older woman (past her prime) and a much younger man.

There is no evolutionary advantage. If it were normal and general practice, the human race would soon die out.

---

But evolution generally keeps a desirable trait. Just like there's an evolutionary benefits for gays(who don't propogate). I suspect there's something useful achieved by cougars and young men. 

[icyfroth]

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@vicr3000 wrote:
Doesn't stop them enjoying the activity though, does it ?
Sex doesnt stop just because you are past producing.

And you also have the feel good factor of walking around with a younger thing on your arm.
Male or female.

---

Well, my question is why is there a survival advantage or what is it in nature that selected out younger men and older women?

---

In answer to that, Bob - I don't know what your on about when you say "evoltionary explanation" to a relationship between an older woman (past her prime) and a much younger man.

There is no evolutionary advantage. If it were normal and general practice, the human race would soon die out.

---

But evolution generally keeps a desirable trait. Just like there's an evolutionary benefits for gays(who don't propogate). I suspect there's something useful achieved by cougars and young men. 

---

I don't see it. Not with regard to propogation. 

Maybe in support to those who do propogate.

[the_bob_delusion]

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@vicr3000 wrote:
Doesn't stop them enjoying the activity though, does it ?
Sex doesnt stop just because you are past producing.

And you also have the feel good factor of walking around with a younger thing on your arm.
Male or female.

---

Well, my question is why is there a survival advantage or what is it in nature that selected out younger men and older women?

---

In answer to that, Bob - I don't know what your on about when you say "evoltionary explanation" to a relationship between an older woman (past her prime) and a much younger man.

There is no evolutionary advantage. If it were normal and general practice, the human race would soon die out.

---

But evolution generally keeps a desirable trait. Just like there's an evolutionary benefits for gays(who don't propogate). I suspect there's something useful achieved by cougars and young men. 

---

I don't see it. Not with regard to propogation. 

Maybe in support to those who do propogate.

---

HOw does it support propogation?

[the_hawk*]

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

---

@vicr3000 wrote:
Doesn't stop them enjoying the activity though, does it ?
Sex doesnt stop just because you are past producing.

And you also have the feel good factor of walking around with a younger thing on your arm.
Male or female.

---

Well, my question is why is there a survival advantage or what is it in nature that selected out younger men and older women?

---

In answer to that, Bob - I don't know what your on about when you say "evoltionary explanation" to a relationship between an older woman (past her prime) and a much younger man.

There is no evolutionary advantage. If it were normal and general practice, the human race would soon die out.

---

But evolution generally keeps a desirable trait. Just like there's an evolutionary benefits for gays(who don't propogate). I suspect there's something useful achieved by cougars and young men. 

---

I don't see it. Not with regard to propogation. 

Maybe in support to those who do propogate.

---

HOw does it support propogation?

---

It doesnt need to support anything above both paties having a good time, generaly with no stings or hung ups

Older women wanting action and a young guy wanting it. win win

[icyfroth]

---

@**bob_is_good** wrote:

HOw does it support propogation?

---

Babysitting lol.

gotta go back later.