on 15-02-2015 12:02 PM
Particularly when every Labor governement in living history has amounted such huge debts whilst in office?
Or is it just that they blindly follow the old mantra, that 'Labor is for the working man?'
Now don't get me wrong - I don't particularly like Abbott, and I sure as h3ll didn't like Rudd or Gillard, but there's so much more to a political party than it's leader.
Feel free to discuss...
on 16-02-2015 12:55 AM
on 16-02-2015 01:00 AM
@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
I did and I don't
And there's the problem. You posted offensively, making light of family losses because you thought it was funny. Didn't laugh. Still not. Doubt anyone is.But you keep bucking yourself up to be the beacon for the the left, no one cares, but keep on doing it.
on 16-02-2015 01:00 AM
@poddster wrote:Why thy obsession with wealthy people?
If you compare yourself with others there will always be greater and lesser people than yourself, no doubt you have done just that for a long time, hence you current attitude to most things
I don't have an obsession with wealthy people but I have a significant awareness that they are the people who are bent on becoming even more wealthy (because they are hungry ghosts) and cannot be satisfied with what they have.
They want more and they will even destroy a country, a landscape, a people, in order to acquire even more.
How much better could you live if you "earned" one billion dollars a year, than if you only earned 100 million dollars per year?
You'd need a very good imagination to answer that question.
on 16-02-2015 01:05 AM
@iapetus_rocks wrote:
@poddster wrote:Why thy obsession with wealthy people?
If you compare yourself with others there will always be greater and lesser people than yourself, no doubt you have done just that for a long time, hence you current attitude to most things
I don't have an obsession with wealthy people but I have a significant awareness that they are the people who are bent on becoming even more wealthy (because they are hungry ghosts) and cannot be satisfied with what they have.
They want more and they will even destroy a country, a landscape, a people, in order to acquire even more.
How much better could you live if you "earned" one billion dollars a year, than if you only earned 100 million dollars per year?
You'd need a very good imagination to answer that question.
Why? don't you want more? Who would you step on? I am really not getting this whole envy thing. It wasn't you, move on already.
on 16-02-2015 01:08 AM
You really don't understand, do you?
I am not envious. I am resentful and angry that those people who are so greedy to want more than they could ever use, by virtue of their greed, cause so much misery and poverty for those who they exploit.
on 16-02-2015 01:10 AM
on 16-02-2015 01:12 AM
I think it's in one of Gina's hip pockets.
16-02-2015 01:17 AM - edited 16-02-2015 01:18 AM
Spoken like a true socialist...
You say that like it's a bad thing?
on 16-02-2015 01:21 AM
@iapetus_rocks wrote:You really don't understand, do you?
I am not envious. I am resentful and angry that those people who are so greedy to want more than they could ever use, by virtue of their greed, cause so much misery and poverty for those who they exploit.
Obviously you are talking about the mining industry that brings in foreign workers on 457 visas. It is pretty disgusting. No regard for even their family, let alone their country.
on 16-02-2015 01:23 AM