Why is Bureau of Met manipulating data re Cyclone Marcia ?

[vicr3000]

Why is Bureau of Met manipulating data re Cyclone Marcia ?

They said it was a Cat 5 cyclone, yet all the wind speeds, sustained and gusts show that it was only a Cat 3.

In addition, the pressure level never got down to a Cat 5.

And regardless of the better building codes compared to Darwin/Tracy in 1974, the damage was no where near a Cat 5.

For a start, the trees still had leaves on them. In all the Cat 5 cyclones in the last 30 years, no trees had leaves

left on them.

In addition, "Data for Middle Percy Island has disappeared from the BOM site, but Jennifer Marohasy kept a copy.

(I’m sure the BOM will be grateful!)..."

Have a read of this.

http://joannenova.com.au/

IN ADDITION

It seems some of the media outlets wewre dissapointed that the damage wasn't worse. That was the impression I got.

Almost like Disaster porn.

Any comments ?

[vicr3000]

What about before that ?

Before Yeppoon ?

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

---

@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:

In Yeppoon yes.

---

Sorry Cat 2 in Yeppoon.

[vicr3000]

Sig

That data doesnt support much ?

Your thoughts ?

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

Before it went down to a Cat 2 in Yeppon, it was a Cat 3..... I can't see anything that indicated anything above a low cat 3.

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

Beating up the Category of a cyclone, will just make people too blahzay.

[vicr3000]

Agree, and it said that in one of the boggs I posted.

That people will now say i lived through a cat 5, so when it happens next time with a real cat 5,
They will get a shock.

[2106greencat]

Well.......

It is starting to rain outside and no-one bloody told me that was going to happen!!

[vicr3000]

I think we have covered everything on the topic, can't see much else to post.

Thanks to all for participating.

I'll move on now, I have another conspiracy to look at

[vicr3000]

The next thread will be on Chem trails