ScienceMag.org
STEPHAN SCHMITZ
* * *
@*tippy*toes* wrote:I am VERY PRO vax. I will stick my arm out for whatever is going. I work in health care. I DO NOT want this vaccine, as vaccines take years to develop and test. This vaccine is coming out way too quckly. However, working in health, I fear I will be forced to have it.
I want a vaccine that is tried and tested over lots of years. I don't want something that fast tracked and rushed, like this one is.
@bright.ton42 wrote:
You are right. This one won't have been tested for long enough. But we are stuck between a rock and a hard place imo. To me it's very much a fingers crossed exercise. I understand at this stage it will be voluntary in Australia and I honestly don't know if I would have it or not.
Profit craving takes over concern for the welfare of the people. Legallised drug peddlers can be just as immoral as illegal ones.
t TRUTHOUT Before COVID-19, Big Pharma Was Neglecting Vaccine and Antiviral ResearchAfter reaching a new low in consumer confidence last year, thanks to public anger over rising drug prices, the pharmaceutical industry’s reputation is on the rise as researchers worldwide rush to develop a vaccine for the novel coronavirus. A new national poll finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has benefited the industry’s public image, with 40 percent of respondents saying they have a more positive view of private drug companies than before the outbreak.
However, public health experts have warned for years that the world is at risk of a major pandemic, and advocates say Big Pharma showed little interest in developing vaccines – or even antibiotic and antiviral medications — until the latest outbreak offered an opportunity to rake in public funding and turn out massive profits with minimal risk.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concernsHidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concerns
A Rush Job + Hunger for Profit not going to be good for the people.Good for someone else though!
@4channel wrote:
* * *
@*tippy*toes* wrote:I am VERY PRO vax. I will stick my arm out for whatever is going. I work in health care. I DO NOT want this vaccine, as vaccines take years to develop and test. This vaccine is coming out way too quckly. However, working in health, I fear I will be forced to have it.
I want a vaccine that is tried and tested over lots of years. I don't want something that fast tracked and rushed, like this one is.
@bright.ton42 wrote:
You are right. This one won't have been tested for long enough. But we are stuck between a rock and a hard place imo. To me it's very much a fingers crossed exercise. I understand at this stage it will be voluntary in Australia and I honestly don't know if I would have it or not.
Profit craving takes over concern for the welfare of the people. Legallised drug peddlers can be just as immoral as illegal ones.
t TRUTHOUT Before COVID-19, Big Pharma Was Neglecting Vaccine and Antiviral ResearchAfter reaching a new low in consumer confidence last year, thanks to public anger over rising drug prices, the pharmaceutical industry’s reputation is on the rise as researchers worldwide rush to develop a vaccine for the novel coronavirus. A new national poll finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has benefited the industry’s public image, with 40 percent of respondents saying they have a more positive view of private drug companies than before the outbreak.
However, public health experts have warned for years that the world is at risk of a major pandemic, and advocates say Big Pharma showed little interest in developing vaccines – or even antibiotic and antiviral medications — until the latest outbreak offered an opportunity to rake in public funding and turn out massive profits with minimal risk.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concernsScienceMag.orgHidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concernsSTEPHAN SCHMITZ
A Rush Job + Hunger for Profit not going to be good for the people.Good for someone else though!
hence my previous consideration : first inline for vaccines : " Vaccine developemt & manufacturer employees including management , then any share holders in the company , then those that approve the vaccine , then Doctors and nurses who administer the vaccine - and no fudging using placebos... "
@rogespeed wrote:
@4channel wrote:
* * *
@*tippy*toes* wrote:I am VERY PRO vax. I will stick my arm out for whatever is going. I work in health care. I DO NOT want this vaccine, as vaccines take years to develop and test. This vaccine is coming out way too quckly. However, working in health, I fear I will be forced to have it.
I want a vaccine that is tried and tested over lots of years. I don't want something that fast tracked and rushed, like this one is.
@bright.ton42 wrote:
You are right. This one won't have been tested for long enough. But we are stuck between a rock and a hard place imo. To me it's very much a fingers crossed exercise. I understand at this stage it will be voluntary in Australia and I honestly don't know if I would have it or not.
Profit craving takes over concern for the welfare of the people. Legallised drug peddlers can be just as immoral as illegal ones.
t TRUTHOUT Before COVID-19, Big Pharma Was Neglecting Vaccine and Antiviral ResearchAfter reaching a new low in consumer confidence last year, thanks to public anger over rising drug prices, the pharmaceutical industry’s reputation is on the rise as researchers worldwide rush to develop a vaccine for the novel coronavirus. A new national poll finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has benefited the industry’s public image, with 40 percent of respondents saying they have a more positive view of private drug companies than before the outbreak.
However, public health experts have warned for years that the world is at risk of a major pandemic, and advocates say Big Pharma showed little interest in developing vaccines – or even antibiotic and antiviral medications — until the latest outbreak offered an opportunity to rake in public funding and turn out massive profits with minimal risk.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concernsScienceMag.orgHidden conflicts? Pharma payments to FDA advisers after drug approvals spark ethical concernsSTEPHAN SCHMITZ
A Rush Job + Hunger for Profit not going to be good for the people.Good for someone else though!
hence my previous consideration : first inline for vaccines : " Vaccine developemt & manufacturer employees including management , then any share holders in the company , then those that approve the vaccine , then Doctors and nurses who administer the vaccine - and no fudging using placebos... "
However reality is that something considered safe needs to be quickly dispenced - and within the next 2 months latest
* * *
@4channel wrote:
Well, best to look at promoting good health and well-being before considering a rush vaccine pushed out by a greed-driven Big Pharma.@rogespeed wrote:
for those that do not need immediate hospitalisation
‘Only a one in 17 billion chance hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work’: medical professor (msn.com)
Thanks and this spells criminal negligence. I watched it. It is also on YouTube. I'm not a fan of Sky News but this is fact!
1.03M subscribers
See .3:19
Quote James:
"We here stories like yours all the time. At the same time, officials, politicians here laugh, sneer, try to shut it down"
Something not right here!
