on 07-07-2016 02:29 PM
who agrees?? 6 years with possibly only 3 years........ i was horrified and i watched the whole trial
on 07-07-2016 02:31 PM
I believe most thinking people outside of South Africa agree and what is worse it has not ended yet....either side can appeal.
on 07-07-2016 02:34 PM
reevas family have said they dont want too and you cant really blame them
on 07-07-2016 02:47 PM
Hope he suffers without his prosthetics.
They're considered a weapon and he can't have them.
on 07-07-2016 02:51 PM
the judge was biased from the beginning in both trials imo
on 07-07-2016 02:54 PM
Video of sentencing -
6 years is better than the last judgement though.
He was out, with house arrest.
on 07-07-2016 02:56 PM
what i will never understand is why didnt he know reeva wasnt in bed if he really didnt mean to killl her he would have looked for her right?? instead of shooting 4 times
on 07-07-2016 03:05 PM
crazy kind of system that has the second sentencing done by the same lame duck (i presume shes in love with the guy) judge who completely screwed it up the first time.
as soon a i knew it was judge 'free him he's innocent' i wasn't at all suprised she was so soft on him.
i heard if its apealed again by the prosecution its goes to a higher group of judges who are rather more effective.
on 07-07-2016 03:24 PM
@carly_and_judy wrote:what i will never understand is why didnt he know reeva wasnt in bed if he really didnt mean to killl her he would have looked for her right?? instead of shooting 4 times
Also, first rule of firing a gun - NEVER fire at a target you can't see.....
Marina.
on 07-07-2016 03:40 PM
I thought he would get minimum 15 years.
However it is what you can prove, not what appears or seems probable.
And lets just for a minute think...........................
................................what if he really thought he was shooting someone else and not the girl he loved.....................
Then he has gone through hell.