on โ23-02-2015 08:10 PM
โ23-02-2015 08:58 PM - edited โ23-02-2015 09:00 PM
ok first of all i've never heard of the darwin awards so i don't know how well known this "honorable prize" is .
secondly , this "study " is superfical , it's taking a minute sample ( over 300 men) and generalising their behaviour to all males but it doesn't factor in age , culture or personality traits ( it also doesn't help that the article opens with "its simple: they're stupid")
thirdly , you can not base your study on this "Male Idioit Theory" because it pretty much means that your study is already biased
โ23-02-2015 09:08 PM - edited โ23-02-2015 09:10 PM
You have lead a very sheltered life if you don't know what a Darwin award is.
Any robust group of males (and females) will mention it at some point when they read an article
where some bloke has topped himself doing something stupid.
"No sympathy" is generally included somewhere in the sentence.
Now, as to the question, "Men are idiots" and most Darwin awards are won by men, even evolution shows that is correct
because the unmanipulated birth rate of males to females is slightly higher for males than females. This is to take into
account the higher death rate of males up to man hood.
Well, something along those lines.
I JUST CHECKED
At birth, the ratio is 107 boys to 100 girls.
on โ23-02-2015 09:13 PM
on โ23-02-2015 09:20 PM
on โ24-02-2015 03:53 AM
I partly agree with you kopes but I think the statement should be "more men than women do idiotic things".
โ24-02-2015 04:35 AM - edited โ24-02-2015 04:36 AM
How about "riskier" as opposed to "idiotic" ?
Men up to a certain age certainly live "on the edge" more than women in general
and correspondingly die in higher numbers.
on โ24-02-2015 07:31 AM
on โ24-02-2015 07:43 AM
Wilk
That says even more about the women who marry them.
Then Darwin's theory of evolution kicks in, although the problem now is the huggy fluffies have wrapped
all the kids up in cotton wool and their is far less chance that the percentage will die before adulthood
that would normally be the case.
You hardly see any kids now with scratches, scabs and bruizes, let alone broken bones.
on โ24-02-2015 08:07 AM
@vicr3000 wrote:
Wilk
That says even more about the women who marry them.
Then Darwin's theory of evolution kicks in, although the problem now is the huggy fluffies have wrapped
all the kids up in cotton wool and their is far less chance that the percentage will die before adulthood
that would normally be the case.
You hardly see any kids now with scratches, scabs and bruizes, let alone broken bones.
you need to get out more.............................check the stats, emergency services and medical centre use