we should be allowed to shoot some people

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/2014/07/01/10/31/teen-girl-slammed-for-hunting-photos

this is a ****** of a sport. how about they go in unarmed

Message 1 of 53
Latest reply
52 REPLIES 52

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people

Why don't male hunters and shooters get the same treatment?

Joono
Message 41 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people

Whilst I don't agree with the comments, I do agree with L'Oreal rescinding the contract. Beautiful girl, could have sold millions in merchandise.

Message 42 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people

I like L'Oreal a whole lot better now     : - )

Message 43 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people

Why is that Stawka?  Loreal are only concerned about their own reputation.

 

Loreal used to have their products tested on animals although I think they have stopped now.

Joono
Message 44 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people

Maybe they still do.  This is from August last year.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/world/loreal-buys-back-into-tests-on-animals-20130823-2sgzu.html

Joono
Message 45 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people

They were quick to point out when the story broke that their products are no longer tested on animals, by them or parties on their behalf. Hopefully they're telling the truth.
Message 46 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people


@j*oono wrote:

Why is that Stawka?  Loreal are only concerned about their own reputation.

 

Loreal used to have their products tested on animals although I think they have stopped now.


  It means simply that I agree with ripping up her contract.   Doesn't matter

  whether they are concerned with their own reputation.   She missed out, that's

  the important bit

 

Message 47 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people


@durruticolumna wrote:
A lot of animals are expressly bred for hunting.I think the term used is 'canned hunting'.And sorry,I don't buy that one-headshot-and-no-suffering line.You're still taking an animal's life.

That is absolutely disgusting; however to kill wild animal for food, and use every bit of it, is OK with me.  actually, it would be preferable to having animals raised specifically for meat, and transported often in horrible conditions to abattoirs where they are mistreated.  To teach children to enjoy taking life just for sake of a thrill, is just sick.

 

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: โ€œThose Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocitiesโ€ .
Message 48 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people

However, now I am bit confused; this picture of elephant is of the Kendal girl, not the girl who lost the L'Oreal contract, but the picture in the article about Axelle Despiegelaere is a picture of  gazelle and also Kendal, not Axelle? So, did Axelle sacked because of the comment? 

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: โ€œThose Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocitiesโ€ .
Message 49 of 53
Latest reply

Re: we should be allowed to shoot some people

โ€œDisgraceful photo of recreational hunter happily posing next to a Triceratops he just slaughtered. Please share so the world can name and shame this despicable man.โ€

 

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/entertainment/film-tv/news/facebook-users-troll-jurassic-park-dire...

Message 50 of 53
Latest reply