on โ28-05-2014 11:08 AM
on โ04-06-2014 07:25 AM
People really watch this garbage?
on โ04-06-2014 08:07 AM
apparently so.
on โ04-06-2014 08:10 AM
Up to them I guess lol Sure wouldn't waste my time on them ๐
on โ04-06-2014 09:07 AM
on โ04-06-2014 09:09 AM
His dog is cute.
His dog's cute face.
sorry.......... couldn't help myself.............. but I didn't watch it so I didn't see the dog.
โ04-06-2014 09:30 AM - edited โ04-06-2014 09:33 AM
"His dog is cute.
His dog's cute face.
sorry.......... couldn't help myself.............. but I didn't watch it so I didn't see the dog."
Oh I know you can't help yourself Az...lol
The apostrophe was for the contracted "dog is" to dog's. Without the apostrophe it would have been dogs, which as you know is plural for dog.
on โ04-06-2014 09:57 AM
well, I am not 100% certain but...... the ' denotes ownership................ I think the dogs cute
or maybe
the dogs' cute............ but might be wrong, now it's bugging me....
on โ04-06-2014 10:32 AM
It would be the dog's cute as in the dog is cute, or
the dogs cute face, or the dog's face... I think.
We need the grammar nazis.
on โ04-06-2014 10:42 AM
@azureline** wrote:well, I am not 100% certain but...... the ' denotes ownership................ I think the dogs cute
or maybe
the dogs' cute............ but might be wrong, now it's bugging me....
Looks right to me.
"His dog is cute.
His dog's cute face."
Can't argue against Quilts she has a PHD behind her name.
on โ04-06-2014 10:53 AM
no I don't................ and anyone can argue with me.............. people often do and they are correct.