on 20-05-2015 11:55 AM
http://www.couriermail.com.au/technology/some-twitter-users-say-theres-something-wrong-with-this-pic...
20-05-2015 06:08 PM - edited 20-05-2015 06:08 PM
perhaps you should trade him in on a more etiquette compliant model
on 20-05-2015 06:13 PM
@*pepe wrote:perhaps you should trade him in on a more etiquette compliant model
a halal version - as long as he has a stamp
on 20-05-2015 06:18 PM
And that flag on the wall they are passing. it's of no nation I can identify.
not a nation.
a flag of new orleans.
on 20-05-2015 06:19 PM
I'm going to be looking for a lifetime warranty next time around at least 😄 They don't make 'em as durable as they used to 😄
on 20-05-2015 06:29 PM
ok. so what difference does it make if they
were actually together or not?
are you saying that if they were in fact together -
the man would have walked on the other side?
20-05-2015 06:32 PM - edited 20-05-2015 06:33 PM
No. I'm thinking the whole story is a storm in a tea cup.
If they were together they may have their own "pattern" and if they're not then what's the issue?
Anyway I was just having a laugh .........
on 20-05-2015 06:37 PM
So did I.
on 20-05-2015 06:41 PM
I think they are together. It's a narrow walkway and they're not that far apart!
And..and and the two different footpath bricks map it out. I'd probably follow my "path" and him his without any conscious decision.
on 20-05-2015 06:43 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:If they were together they would be closer to each other what if they are work colleagues?
If they were together they would be closer to each other
what if they are work colleagues?
Yes, that is a possibility, isn't it.
She’s walking on the wild side....way to go.
never-displayed
