on 23-11-2013 09:36 PM
I recently had an antique vase broken on its travels though Auspost, so I told the buyer to claim it through Auspost as it was insured, to my surprise the buyer contacted me and said that the item was not covered by auspost because it was fragile.. Now when I go to the Auspost website and follow their instructions on fragile packing I find ;
Fragile items (e.g. glass)
Reading the above on the website is encouraging people to send fragiles(misleading)
After adhering to these terms I get told its not covered and the insurance was werthless and that no fragile items are covered by Auspost. My concern is how many other people are getting the same treatment and how misleading "the website is on fragile items", "how many people are paying for insurance when they will not be covered at all?" This is clearly a scam and comming up to christmas, with alcohol, glass and pottery objects etc.....AUSPOST should state clearly what is covered and what's not covered by insurance etc. I didn't relize how lucky I have been, let alone as well as other sellers, after sending thousands of dollars worth of fragile items over the years, Clearly it has been dumb luck until now. The only clause I have found relating to damage etc is this clause;
You agree to indemnify Australia Post and its officers, agents and employees ("Indemnified Parties") in respect of any claim, action, damage, loss, liability, cost, charge, expense, outgoing or payment (including legal expenses (on a full indemnity basis) arising from or relating to:
(a) Your use of the Services, PostPay or the Website;
(b) a breach of these Terms of Use by You; or
(c) Your breach of any applicable law.
Not once do I see anything relating to fragile items in this clause and or on the website, the fact that "fragile items are not covered at all" has not been "DIRECTLY" mentioned. This is very concerning and after getting nowhere with auspost, I will chase this matter up with the correct authorities and have mentioned this just for the purpose of other sellers so they dont get ripped off paying for insurance on fragile items when they will not be covered for anyway....SHAME ON YOU AUSTRALIA POST...... as a result of this I will cease trading on ebay with fragiles such as antique pottery,glass,porcelain etc and that makes me sad because it was a fun hobby and I enjoyed finding those cool things for people over the years...
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 24-11-2013 12:39 AM
FRAGILE is not covered at all .......fragile .......your insurance will apply to anything else but fragile .........fragile
on 24-11-2013 12:46 AM
I think that 6.2 and 8.13 are where they are going to get around the "fragile item" thing.
I have found stuff going back from 2009 where AP have claimed unequivocally that they do not cover fragile items, that all items are carried in the same manner and not given any preferential treatment etc.Talk of unable to see inside mail bags, and that must be able tom withstand a 20 kg box being fropped on it.
So they will fall back on ?obviously the item was not properly packaged"
They do not say that if you follow their packing TIPS, that this will guarantee they will not break - they are exactly that - TIPS to have a shot at getting there iykwim.
Anyway, good luck with the media.
BTW, you never actually said if you DID follow the AP packaging tips for fragile items, did you?
on 24-11-2013 12:46 AM
@reallyhardtofind wrote:FRAGILE is not covered at all .......fragile .......your insurance will apply to anything else but fragile .........fragile
where has this come from?
on 24-11-2013 12:48 AM
YES Im trying to help my buyer.....the use of the word fragile changes everything........they have been quite plain about fragile items and insurance I will chase it up on monday I have read the entire website and if you read carefully they cover their bottom but the fragile changes everything ring em up yourself ....I know someone who sells tea set bulk lots and auspost will not honour insurance on fragile items.......hope you never have the same trouble ......
on 24-11-2013 12:51 AM
well, I guess that the iunsurance wasn't a complete waste or loss - if they had have lost it, instead of it being broken, you would have been covered for more than the discressionary p[ayment of $50
One thing I did learn in all this is you can post some live animals......
that spun me out a bit/
on 24-11-2013 12:52 AM
"After adhering to these terms"
yes I did
second paragraph
sorry "adhering or following" what ever
on 24-11-2013 12:54 AM
I wish it was lost lol
animals lol
on 24-11-2013 01:02 AM
Maybe a loop hole - but I think we are clutching
Section 27 (4b)
Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989
(4) Australia Post shall ensure:
(b) that the performance standards (including delivery times) for
the letter service reasonably meet the social, industrial and
commercial needs of the Australian community.
.....................................
BUT 26 kind of really covers their butts
26 Commercial obligation
Australia Post shall, as far as practicable, perform its functions in a
manner consistent with sound commercial practice
on 24-11-2013 01:04 AM
@reallyhardtofind wrote:"After adhering to these terms"
yes I did
second paragraph
sorry "adhering or following" what ever
oops sorry.....
on 24-11-2013 01:07 AM
what bothers me is people are buying insurance for ""fragile items"" or items that could be ""deemed fragile"" thinking they are covered but they are not, this is misleading and the regular joe should know, who reads the terms and condition of auspost lol only me....and not many would understand their legal jargin anyways
thats my beaf