on 26-08-2013 04:11 PM
Common Law provides us with a postal rule in Adams v Lindsell which says that once a letter of acceptance is posted that it is deemed accepted and not reliant on the acceptance being communicated to the offerror. (sic) (usually, acceptance must be communicated).
That being, it stands to reason that ownership of the letter must pass from the sender to the receiver at the point of postage.
Two questions arise from this;
1) Once posted (either lodged over counter or placed in a designated mail box), the sender should not be able to retrieve the letter/package, as they no longer own it.
What is the actual ruling on this? Can a sender retrieve a postal item after mailing it?
2) In eBayland, The buyer usually/technically pays for the postage, and the seller is merely the agent charged with performing the act. However, despite the buyer paying for the service to have an item that legally belongs to them delivered, why is it that Australia Post will not allow the buyer to make enquiries about that parcel if, for example, it gets lost in the post?
It is my understanding, that the seller must lodge any complaint/claim (which does make sense as they would have the paperwork), but then the buyer is reliant solely on communication from the seller.
So, why is it that the legal owner of the postal item, who paid for the delivery service is prevented from making enquiries or instigating investigations as to its whereabouts?
on 31-08-2013 04:14 PM
because free trade doesn't refer to the cost of doing that business. It refers to the ability to trade without (too many) physical restrictions.
Aust also has free trade agreements with other countries - it doesn't mean that the cost of doing that business is free of costs.
on 06-09-2013 02:16 PM
Just bumping to the top so that Aus Post can find the thread.
on 06-09-2013 04:30 PM
If they can't find it through the link you provided....
on 25-10-2013 11:22 AM