Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ29-04-2015 02:49 PM
Looks like a time for some direct action by Sellers.
I suggest sellers continue with the excellent service of posting within 1 day of payment but change their delivery time to something much longer , say 7 days. This will increase the estimated delivery time and help avoid the absolutely unreasonable and ridiculous defect for INR.
Join up - do it now.
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ29-04-2015 03:35 PM
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ29-04-2015 04:31 PM
I'm wondering what the effect will be when Aust Post start charging extra for the privilege of our Large Letters taking 3 days longer.
Will Ebay change their stupid Estimated Delivery Times??????
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ29-04-2015 05:17 PM
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
โ29-04-2015 05:34 PM - edited โ29-04-2015 05:38 PM
@hamsy3 wrote:
I'm wondering what the effect will be when Aust Post start charging extra for the privilege of our Large Letters taking 3 days longer.
Will Ebay change their stupid Estimated Delivery Times??????
I'm also wondering what effect paying extra will actually have - because it is going to mean more sorting at the handling centres ???
(Which would presumably create more delays)
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
โ29-04-2015 06:11 PM - edited โ29-04-2015 06:14 PM
I can see the whole thing turning into an absolute fiasco in the AP sorting centres.
What are they planning to do, deliver some on one day and leave a pile just sitting there to be delivered on another?
The snail mail service will probably get way out of hand as more and more builds up as a backlog in the system.
This is one of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard of but then what do you expect from a logistics business run by bankers!
(a minimum of 70% of AP's executive board are ex-NAB mates of Fahour)
So eBay will, I suppose, give us yet another option for postage?
For letters that would now be 3:
1. Express
2. Priority
3. Regular
They can't get the delivery times right for one service let alone 3 lol.
And if we change our handling times upward that pretty much cancels out any benefit gained from the first 2 services.
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
โ29-04-2015 06:21 PM - edited โ29-04-2015 06:25 PM
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ29-04-2015 06:55 PM
I can see the whole thing turning into an absolute fiasco in the AP sorting centres.
We have had a two tier service in the UK for a long, long time and there was no fiasco at the sorting centres as the stamps all contain a code which is machine read and mail directed to the correct place for the stamp value.
It says in this book I am reading that by 2065 80% of women will be overweight.
See what a trendsetter I am?
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ29-04-2015 07:15 PM
That may work well in the U.K., but this is Australia we're talking about.
Postage times are slow enough now without anyone fiddling with them. As said on another thread - purchased Monday, posted Tuesday, delivered Friday. This was an across Melbourne metro delivery. 35 minutes drive. 4 days to get (I did say 3 on the other thread, and cats had a very similar situation)
@ stampingpaws - while I agree in principle with what you are saying about extending your postage time to 7 days (to avoid INR's), as a sometimes buyer, I have found that the estimated delivery time assessed by eBay has actually put me off from making a purchase from a particular seller. I have no doubt that the seller(s) would post within 1 day, but from a buyer's perspective, if an estimated delivery time is 7-10 days (or more if you increase to 7 days postage time), then there is a double-think about whether you make that purchase. I know I could contact the seller to find out what is his/her REAL handling time, but I wonder how many would actually bother to do so - or just do as I have previously done, and move on to another seller.
It could end up being a 'cutting off nose....' exercise to increase handling times.
Re: Direct action required by sellers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on โ29-04-2015 10:46 PM
Now that buyers can claim INR at the end of estimated delivery period and with Auspost having huge troubles with sorting machines not to mention the almost weekly truck fire. I think it is very prudent to extend the estimated delivery time by increasing the handling time to as long as you think fit.
As a sometime buyer - I buy using these requirements in this order. Is it what I want, Can I afford it. Do I want BIN or go through the auction process. Is the postage cost acceptable (US35.00 for a single stamp is out of the ball park). Is the feed back not too bad. Only after all these are met would I consider how long it will take to get to me. Naturally, there are exceptions but these are rare.
I sell Stamp Albums as PDF files on CD which I post to buyers as untracked large letters. So far I've had 2 defects for INR even though I replaced the item immediately by sending the PDF file attached to the PayPal email.

