Don't bother reporting copied pics anymore

It used to be a simple process for a seller to report someone who has copied one of your photos. You just filled in the item numbers and the reason and sent it off, and checked back a while later and the listing was gone. Not anymore!!!!!. Be prepared for a runaround. I rang ebay in desperation at the first form. They told me i had to report it to the vero team, and i did. After a few hours trying to work out how to sign a pdf which they sent me i thought i had won. Silly me!!!! The form they sent was for the USA, and i had to fill out another different form. This aussie pdf form needs the form to be signed by a (not related)witness!!!!! as well.

Some other people would keep jumping through these hoops but i gave up. So it seems that all the lazy bottom dwellers can copy to their hearts content knowing that it is just too difficult to report them.

Just another reason to be turned off by ebay and their stupidity in not looking after their customers.

Message 1 of 15
Latest reply
14 REPLIES 14

Re: Don't bother reporting copied pics anymore


@chameleon54 wrote:

@digital*ghost

I,m not a lawyer, but to me it looks like this is exactly what the user agreement says.


I know what it looks like - that's why I'm trying to put it into words that shows what it means, instead. 

 

 

Message 11 of 15
Latest reply

Re: Don't bother reporting copied pics anymore


@digital*ghost wrote:

@chameleon54 wrote:

@digital*ghost

I,m not a lawyer, but to me it looks like this is exactly what the user agreement says.


I know what it looks like - that's why I'm trying to put it into words that shows what it means, instead. 

 

 


It would take someone much braver or more stupid than me to engage in debate with you on the finer points of legal terms and conditions in contracts. I bow to your superior knowledge..........What digi says is almost certainly right !!!

Message 12 of 15
Latest reply

Re: Don't bother reporting copied pics anymore

I dunno if you're being facetious Smiley Tongue but I thought I should add some things that highlight what I'm trying to get across, but want to preface it by acknowledging I am not a lawyer, and to have an in-depth understanding of the finer points of these kinds of clauses, I recommend consulting with a lawyer who specialises in copyright law and these kinds of contracts, because the range of my knowledge is limited (I just take an interest in this sort of thing, and have done for several years, owing to my many creative pursuits over the years - as such my knowedge is essentially functional, and relevant to my personal interests, and I have been proven wrong on many occasions, even recently by your good self Smiley Very Happy ). 

 

What I do understand is that "to the extent permitted by law" is an important phrase.

 

To put that in a more relatable context - where the extent of the law is more commonly known and understood... I can knock on the door to my friend's house, and when they open it, say "if you let me inside your house, then you agree that  - to the extent permitted by law - I will be able to take full possession of any contents in your home of my choosing".

 

The law does not permit me to steal from their home, no matter what I say before they let me in, therefore that scenario would not allow me to steal from them with impunity - even if it was a signed contract, the law doesn't change. So it's a actually just a very misleading way of saying "the law won't allow me to steal from you". (That is kind of a lawyer's job, in some ways, to make it look like one thing while legally saying the opposite, lol, because then people read it and just don't pursue anything because they think they've signed their rights away). 

 

My friend would roll their eyes, let me in, and say "yes, you can have some cookies". Smiley LOL

 

ebay is letting people know that the permissions granted are limited, but neglecting to clarify what the permissions are and instead focusing on uncontextualised scenarios in which the permissions that are granted may be applied, in a way that makes it look like they can do anything they want with all content on their site. 

Message 13 of 15
Latest reply

Re: Don't bother reporting copied pics anymore


@digital*ghost wrote:

I dunno if you're being facetious Smiley Tongue but I thought I should add some things that highlight what I'm trying to get across,



No sarcasm intended digi, I have great respect for your knowledge in this area. The time and advice you provide on these sorts of issues is always valuable and adds some often needed facts to discussions. .....Smiley Happy

Message 14 of 15
Latest reply

Re: Don't bother reporting copied pics anymore

It also says that ebay can use them, or their agents (or whatever). It doesn't give just ANYONE permission to use them.

If they go in the ebay catalogue that's another issue. I know that when they changed the user agreement they told us that any photos we used could be included in the ebay catalogue if that's what ebay wanted.
Message 15 of 15
Latest reply