on 19-08-2016 09:45 PM
Hi all,
I have had a look at eBays image policy and it seems pretty clear cut in relation to images - no borders / text / additional logos etc etc. Why is it then that every other seller in my industry has listings with borders / backgrounds / text / logos that clearly have been edited - both in gallery images and main listing images? I have heard if you host the images yourself you can do what you like - is that what everyone is doing? I would love to have a clear cut answer to this one. Thanks.
on 19-08-2016 10:05 PM
Short answer - ask eBay. Which the boards are not.
Longer answer - whatever you can get away with. if your images are accepted, they are acceptable.
Stop sweating the small stuff.
on 19-08-2016 10:38 PM
on 20-08-2016 12:31 PM
I agree. I saw the update (was it a year ago now?) requiring all images to have no data written on them/logos, etc. I complied but many people continue. There is no point of having a policy if it is not taken seriously by both sides.
on 20-08-2016 02:41 PM
there was a thread some time back about this. I recall finding in an eBay policy that although the rule applies it IS NOT enforced.
Those that are still including text and borders will not be sanctioned by eBay. I will try to dig up the old thread and post a link on this one.
on 20-08-2016 04:44 PM
At one stage ebay intended to bring in this policy but then backed down on making it compulsory - they recommend to avoid borders, texts etc in photos but it is not against any ebay policy if sellers do use borders etc.
http://pages.ebay.com.au/help/policies/picture.html
20-08-2016 06:08 PM - edited 20-08-2016 06:12 PM
@autoelectricalaccessories wrote:Hi all,
I have had a look at eBays image policy and it seems pretty clear cut in relation to images - no borders / text / additional logos etc etc. Why is it then that every other seller in my industry has listings with borders / backgrounds / text / logos that clearly have been edited - both in gallery images and main listing images? I have heard if you host the images yourself you can do what you like - is that what everyone is doing? I would love to have a clear cut answer to this one. Thanks.
I hope this post meets your "100% correct answer" criteria, let me know if it does not and I will be sure to think twice before proffering advice in the future.
I found on this page http://sellercentre.ebay.com.au/selling-on-ebay/pictures (in the seller centre). Here is a screengrab with a nice red box around the section that says they are not enforcing the recommendations:
on 20-08-2016 09:06 PM
I remember when they first brought the rule in and did enforce it. The enforcement was very hit and miss - the photos that were the cause for the rule were ignored and some photos that contained an object with writing, such as a book or a t-shirt, got rejected because the image bots thought they images didn't comply.
Quite the farce that took far too long to resolve.
on 20-08-2016 10:21 PM
I used to sell camera lenses on another ID when we had to pay a fee for every listing. I would print the lens characteristics and serial number on a piece of paper and then sit the lens on the paper for the gallery pic. This gave me what amounted to a subtitle for the listing without having pay the extra charge for a subtitle. I guess this is why eBay introduced the rule . . . . . which later became a recommendation.
on 23-08-2016 04:16 PM
Aha...good to see that but depednding where you look Ebay does stress the following in the Seller Centre hence general confusion - http://pages.ebay.com/sellerinformation/how-to-take-product-photos/ebay-photo-requirements.html