Thankfully, we've only come across one, so far. It is very annoying and time consuming especially if you don't subscribe to the eBay full automation process.
I have a question, but it's more about feedback for these and similar nuisance buyers. With the restriction eBay has placed on neg feedback I feel we are put in a position where we are prohibited from telling the truth, thereby not only being untrue to ourselves, but potentially putting other hard working sellers, who have invested in eBay, at risk too.
I'm wondering, although I probably know the answer, what would happen if, with the positive tick you are compelled to provide, if your accompanying comments were, 'NO COMMENT.' In essence, you're not saying anything negative, but I guess eBay will take the point of view in terms of the inference drawn.
It is terribly unfair at the moment and there must be a better way than just Carte Blanche outlawing neg feedback. And that leads me to another question and I'm serious, because we haven't been caught in this situation yet. When you give that positive tick to a buyer of questionable repute, what do you actually say in the comments field? Do you lie and say they're a terrific buyer? This is all sorts of wrong. Or, do you just not leave feedback? None of this is making much sense or resonating with my sense of 'commonsense' and notion of a 'fair go.'
Still learning. Still concerned and very confused about many of the changes.
Melina
