What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

I have asked the seller in question and I am awaiting a reponse ffrom them direct as I thought initially it was an error in their lisiting, but further investigations to their other listings I have found a lot more so I am now doubting it is an error.......but what would they gain out of it as it is my undertanding we as sellers pay FVF on all charges including the postage?  or am I missing something.....? The item in question is only $1.99 (but the average price to sell would be around $5-$7 I guess)  and  the postage quoted is $15.80 (but could easily be posted at large letter rate for $2 as only a thin clothing item or if wanting tracking $8.25 ) Thanks

Message 1 of 11
Latest reply
10 REPLIES 10

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

Possibly they don't know that the FVF includes the postage.  They may be stuck in the old tricks.  Maybe just make them an offer for a total price and that you'll pay direct by PayPal, instead of trying to deal with their silly tricks.

 

On the other hand, perhaps they include insurance and registered mail?  Even though it's seemingly a low cost item.

Message 2 of 11
Latest reply

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

Thanks. I just a reply to say there was an 'ERROR WITH THIS PARTICULAR LISTING, BUT UNFORTUNATELY CANNOT CHANGE NOW, BUT WILL ADJUST INVOICE TO $8.25 AFTER PURCHASE".......nice of them ! LOL
Message 3 of 11
Latest reply

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

Not necessarily inflated, if the clothing item weighs more than 500gm, then it would cost close to that by the time the seller took into account packaging and the additional fees eBay charges on postage.  If it is under 500gm, your $8.25 covers the postage, but not packaging and fees.  Even if it could be posted as a large letter, (and if it is an adult clothing item that is doubtful due to size and thickness) using letter post is problematic for sellers these days, as without tracking to show the item was posted within the handling time, the seller will get an automatic defect if the item arrives later than eBay's ridiculous delivery estimates.  The seller could also be using Express for the same reason.

Cheers,

Penny
Message 4 of 11
Latest reply

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

Thanks for your reply....I just added that the seller has replied to my query & admitted the error in the postage quoted but now couldn't change it for some reason..the item is infants singlet, so weighs no more than 100grams if that, but said the price should of been $8.25 and would amend the invoice once I purchased.....not sure what she would do with all her other listings...just seems a bit "fishy" to me
Message 5 of 11
Latest reply

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

Yes, I just read that.  I agree, then, it could be posted for $2 but with letter post there is no protection for the seller against eBay's on time postage defects.  I sell small light items and I use letter post but have pushed back my handling time to avoid the defects, as I will not ask my customers to lie if they are placed in the position where an item arrives after eBay's estimate.  I can understand other sellers reverting to parcel post though.

Cheers,

Penny
Message 6 of 11
Latest reply

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?


@lady_and_the_tramp wrote:

I have asked the seller in question and I am awaiting a reponse ffrom them direct as I thought initially it was an error in their lisiting, but further investigations to their other listings I have found a lot more so I am now doubting it is an error.......but what would they gain out of it as it is my undertanding we as sellers pay FVF on all charges including the postage?  or am I missing something.....? The item in question is only $1.99 (but the average price to sell would be around $5-$7 I guess)  and  the postage quoted is $15.80 (but could easily be posted at large letter rate for $2 as only a thin clothing item or if wanting tracking $8.25 ) Thanks


to cover $8.25 postage a seller actually has to spend about $10 add a bit of packaging a few dollars for your time plus cost to get to the post office (if I get a bus it costs about $4 and do not forget about my time what should I charge for 1 hour?) and $15.80 is not as over the top as it may appear. 

Buyer just see a stamp and take that as the price but it is postage and handling fees there is a lot more to it than the postage cost. For a buyer it really does not matter if it is put as a postage fee or added to the cost of the item you still have to pay for it.

 

Having a higher postage means if they wanted they could give a bigger discount so it is if anything to your advantage rather than the free postage I off because you know there is 0 discount from me ๐Ÿ˜‰

Message 7 of 11
Latest reply

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

 

Purely adding a general reply to this question, rather than commenting on the specific scenario of the singlet and postage cost, since this may or may not be applicable to them...

 

Lower prices and a higher P&H cost can sometimes be for encouraging multiple purchases. (eg say a seller has a flat rate cost set up that's a bit above average P&H, when people know that postage is X amount no matter how much they buy, they tend to buy more to make the higher P&H worthwhile, thus 1 item at $2 won't really do anything much, but 20 items at $40 means the seller (probably) gets a more worthwhile sale, and the buyer may ultimately even pay less postage than what it costs the seller.

 

There's virtually no advantage to inflating P&H, except on the odd instance someone has a change of mind and wants to return - item price, but not postage, is refunded in those cases (generally, and also if facilitated via an eBay request). Not really a worthwhile tactic these days, all things considered (aside from bad impressions and people being tempted to take other actions to avoid losing such a large proprtion of the total payment, sellers are now able to implement restocking fees if they want to). 

 

Message 8 of 11
Latest reply

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

Odds are they listed by reusing the template for an item over 500gm, and forgot to amend the shipping cost. They cant revise it if it has bids or less than 12hrs left.

 

A mistaken high postage will keep bids down (if its an auction) so if they are wiling to ammend invoice and only you know you could be on to a good deal.

-------------------------------

ASSUMPTION IS THE MOTHER OF ALL STUFF UPS!!
Message 9 of 11
Latest reply

Re: What advantage if any is it to seller to have low item cost BUT inflated postage costs?

you may also find its a "trick" in the hope that some ppl wont pay close attention and think they are getting a bargain but when they go to pay realise that they have not thought to look at the addition postage cost?

Message 10 of 11
Latest reply