Joe, literally everything you have "explained" about the law is wrong. I'll address your claims as someone who does actually know a little something about the law.
lets talk about photos in a post office, once you hand over your letters and as soon as the postman stamps them ,they are deemed to be the property of the federal gov
Speaking from an eBay transaction perspective, the moment that the buyer pays for an item in full, ownership/title in that item is transferred. You no longer own that item, long before you ever see the inside of the post office.
Australia Post are a carrier, no more, no less. What occurs is what is known as a bailment for reward, this means they take possession of your item upon payment of a sum and you authorise them to deliver the item (remembering that the item is already owned by the buyer) to a third party. Title is never transferred, that is the Government never has any legal interest in the item that Australia Post are carrying.
once you touch or take a photo ,then theres privacy laws. its simple its not yours anymore.
It ceased to be yours once payment was made, by your logic once payment has been made you couldn't take a photo even in the privacy of your own home.
Yes privacy laws exist, but they do not apply in this instance. Photography of any person or item is permitted in all but the most limited of circumstances. The only time photography is prohibited is when a person could have a reasonable expectation to privacy. The law varies a little between states but generally the test is something like using a toilet etc. Taking a photo of an item of mail upon lodgement is perfectly legal and has been used and accepted as evidence in Australian courts many times.
just because something is said in the law , companies have agreements with them . like the bank on charge backs the law states a bank cant take money out of another banks client. but the banks have an agreement that allows that. and we all know that happens.
"The law" states nothing of the kind. Banks and other financial institutions are signatories to a number of codes of practice which are generally endorsed by ASIC, a government regulatory body. These documents permit, and in fact compel banks to act in a certain manner when unauthorised usage or item not as described is reported to them.
look at the law about porn movies , i still have had nobody answere that. its simple the law states porn movies can only be sold in canberra. have a look around most suburbs have an adult shop. i would say there is an agreement with the law. these shops are not hidden , some are the size of small supermarkets.
This deals with classification, not content. X rated movie can legally be sold in both the ACT and NT but R rated movies, many of which you might be referring to as "porn" can legally be sold in every state in Australia to any person over the age of 18. I will not dispute that X rated movies have been sold in prohibited states in the past, however there is no "agreement with the law", adult shops are frequently the subject of random inspections by law enforcement and are prosecuted when in breach of any applicable laws. All reputable adult shops outside of the 2 territories will stock only R rated material.
