let me explain some parts of the law

[joethenuts]

a lot of posters keep thinking that if its written in the law ,thats it.  well wrong ,ask any solicitor.

if that was the case we would not need any courts.

a law is written for instance law 1.   then there is only if  a  or   f   or section  bla , does not ocur.

lets talk about photos in a post office, once you hand over your letters and as soon as the postman stamps them ,they are deemed to be the property of the federal gov. once you touch or take a photo ,then theres privacy laws.  its simple its not yours anymore.

we also have posters complaining about paypal taking money out of your account when there is a problem.

read your contract with them , you agreed to there policy  ,if you dont agree dont sign up or take the contract to a solicitor. 

just because something is said in the law , companies have agreements with them  .  like the bank on charge backs  the law states a bank cant take money out of another banks client.  but the banks have an agreement that allows that.  and we all know that happens.

look at the law about porn movies , i still have had nobody answere that.  its simple the law states porn movies can only be sold in canberra.    have a look around  most suburbs have an adult shop.   i would say there is an agreement with the law.  these shops are not hidden , some are the size of small supermarkets.

in fact a couple of months ago i won an auction on ebay for some new steel paint tins and lids , when she gave me the pick up details  it was to an adult bookstore , i then looked at the  item number  in case i bid on the wrong line, but all correct. anyway i drive to the loading bay ,she opened up the roller door and my eyes nearly popped out , as i was loading the boxes , i did not ask why they had new empty paint tins , but i did ask why the girl on the corner wearing  just underwear was smiling at me ,she said thats a blow up doll , yes but whats her name.     lol

[bakeandfry]

So its me handing the article to the carrier, not the carrier tresspassing on my property, and not courier, but carrier

[joethenuts]

hi bake  not sure how to do that   took me 4 months to work out how to put a picture up   if you click on users with his id name  tall bearded  you will get to there

[collect247]

Yes handing it over,not picking it up so how is that the same? beats me

[bakeandfry]

4 months to work out how to put a picture up... Took me about a year for me to figure that one out and i use a phone, i can guide you how to do it by phone but it probably wont be the same as pc.

[joethenuts]

i used to be so good at doing things but these days  forget it. and now on windows 10 , i am getting there. lol

[bakeandfry]

Beats me to.

[padi*0409]

As in the old adage bake and crow "if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck then the chances are it's a duck"...............

I'm out of here until some relevant and real information comes through. 

[davewil1964]

It's not hard, Joe.

If I stipulate pickup allowed, then I allow pickup.

If I don't include pickup allowed and stipulate Australia Post, or a courier, or a pigeon, as the carrier, then a buyer explicitly accepts AP or courier or pigeon as the carrier when they pay. It's called a contract.

Once they pay, they own it. Once I deliver to the nominated carrier, AUSTRALIAN LAW (not what you interpret it to be, but the actual one) deems the item delivered.

Rather than cherry pick out of context bits of other members' posts you might like to look into consumer law. And then cite REAL statutes that back your position. If you can find them.

[k1ooo-slr-sales]

---

@joethenuts wrote:

sorry for my delay i had to fix upa few things   , i have always had a copy but its a very well respected law man on these posts , which i used to niggle with him  and everybody told me and prob you  that he should know not me  anyway its the [tall bearded]  post 404 message 44

---

joe, I'd like to clear something up with you.

So you have respect for the opinions posted by tall-bearded01 AND you take their opinion as fact when it comes to "the law" ?

Niggle with him indeed, I found this little gem on a previous thread:

and as far as his posts go, not everyone has agreed with his 'credentials' and him proffering legal advice on public forums

[4green2000]

---

@pennyforum14 wrote:

Joe, you run a paint store, so if I was looking for an expert opinion on paint, I might just possibly ask you.  But unless you can present me with a law degree or a statement of employment that shows you have substantial experience working in a law firm, any "advice" you have to offer on legal matters is nothing more than personal opinion, and ill-informed at that since you freely admit you don't use Auspost much.  Stick to paint mate, I'm sure you know that better.

---

I coudn't have said it better myself.