Can I win this counterfeit case?

Hi everyone, I'm looking to open a case with an eBay seller but I am unsure if I have enough evidence to win the case.

 

I had been led to believe that a seller had been selling authentic Audio-Technica products. Within minutes of opening it, I was able to identify it as a counterfeit.

 

Now I am already having problems with it. 
I suspect it being a fake as
1. Its sound quality was as terrible as my webcam microphone
2. It picked up a lot of background sounds, which indicated by dozens of reviews, shouldn't.

It has now only been 3 days and its sound pick-up has dropped SIGNIFICANTLY. I have not dropped it or moved it since I installed it and have done many things to try and fix the problem. Including, restarting my pc and unplugging it and replugging it back in.
 
After contacting the seller and telling them my suspiscion.
Their response was, quite literally quoted:
"Yep you got us we are selling fake microphones, what an astute and savvy customer you are. It's amazing that you managed to catch us out on this fake microphone when none of our thousands of customers have managed to do so!".
 
Is the above enough (direct admittance to selling a counterfeit) to win a case? I am not wiling to pay shipping fees to send it to Audio-Technica themselves to do a frequency test to prove it or refund a counterfeit product at my cost .
 
Message 1 of 29
Latest reply
28 REPLIES 28

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?

Could I get a link to the source? Or a pointer where I may read that?

 

Otherwise, quoted from the policy I linked.

"If you lose a Significantly Not as Described claim because the item you sold is counterfeit, you will be required to provide a full refund to the buyer and you will not receive the item back. (It will be destroyed.)"

Message 11 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?


@ikiryou.kodomo wrote:

First of all, they state they have sold to thousands of sellers. They have no proof of that and their eBay only has maybe 200 or so feedbacks. And yes, I figured that this may not be enough to win a case, but you never know if it's possible or not.

As for "illegal for them to be sent", is not "rubbish" as you put. You have obviously not read any policies. I understand that nothing may not actually happen in the case that an illegal item is sent. But that policy certainly exists.
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=xpt/Marketing/popup/UAeBay-outside
Section 14.3, under "How is the Claim resolved?"
If I can't win the case then I will send it back for a refund for malfunction.
Thanks for the input.


From the item location (Eastgardens NSW) I am guessing they are a retail store in the Westfields complex so have quite possible sold the thousands of item that they say they have.

And there is not Section 14.3 in that link.

Message 12 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?

I yet have to see PO arresting anyone for posting even a genuine fakes

 


I'm not surpised! Smiley LOL

Message 13 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?

13.4 my mistake.

And they are not inside Westfields. They are an outlet outside of it.

Message 14 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?


@ikiryou.kodomo wrote:

Could I get a link to the source? Or a pointer where I may read that?

 

Otherwise, quoted from the policy I linked.

"If you lose a Significantly Not as Described claim because the item you sold is counterfeit, you will be required to provide a full refund to the buyer and you will not receive the item back. (It will be destroyed.)"


You are quoting from Section 13.4 and if you read the whole section you will find that you have to PROVE that it is fake by providing the written report from a qualified 3rd party.

Only then will you be instructed to destroy the item.  Until then, you must return it at your own expense by trackable post to get the refund.

 

If you know they are a retail outlet then why do you doubt that they have sold what they say they have sold.

Message 15 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?

I would assume the ADMISSION by the seller that it was fake (keep that email for heavens sake,as Paypal have no sense of humour) whether it was meant to be sarcastic or not, would be proof to Paypal of a fake item. A statement like from the seller may see them have to refund ALL buyers who purchased that item. Bad karma on the sellers behalf i say. They admitted that ALL the items sold were fake, a sarcastic comment could get them in BIG trouble.

Message 16 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?

Them having a retail outlet is not proof the items are genuine, a very large number of items sold in retail outlets are counterfeit.

 

It is certainly possible to prove an item is fake without a letter from a 3rd party but it requires persistance and a lot of research. I would never be prepared to return a fake item, if I had enough evidence, so that the seller could re sell it and rip somebody else off.

 

My reply to the OP's seller would be that as I was absolutely sure it was counterfeit I was passing all details onto the manufacturers, customs authorities and the online auction fraud police report site so if they were indeed genuine they would have nothing to worry about.

____________________________________________________
It says in this book I am reading that by 2065 80% of women will be overweight.

See what a trendsetter I am?
Message 17 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?

Australia Post Dangerous and Prohibited Items

http://auspost.com.au/parcels-mail/dangerous-and-prohibited-items.html

 

Page 16

Section 3 - Other Goods Prohibited or Restricted In All Services

D3.1 - Possession or Carriage Prohibited by Law

Australia Post prohibits any item the possession or carriage of which is prohibited by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory.

 

Australian Federal Police

http://www.afp.gov.au/policing/ip-crime/faq.aspx#What%20items%20are%20counterfeited

 

Australian Government: IP Australia Counterfeiting and Piracy

http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/ip-infringement/counterfeiting-and-piracy/

Message 18 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?


@book-of-hezekiah wrote:

Australia Post Dangerous and Prohibited Items

http://auspost.com.au/parcels-mail/dangerous-and-prohibited-items.html

 

Page 16

Section 3 - Other Goods Prohibited or Restricted In All Services

D3.1 - Possession or Carriage Prohibited by Law

Australia Post prohibits any item the possession or carriage of which is prohibited by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory.

 

Australian Federal Police

http://www.afp.gov.au/policing/ip-crime/faq.aspx#What%20items%20are%20counterfeited

 

Australian Government: IP Australia Counterfeiting and Piracy

http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/ip-infringement/counterfeiting-and-piracy/


That is all well and good but it still comes back to the OP getting PROOF that it is counterfeit.

You can stand on your high horse all you like but how is Australia Post going to know what is in the package?

 

The OP wants his money back...he can take the high moral ground and perhaps have to pay to prove the items are fake and hope paypal will refund without him having to return them.

Or he can take the easy and possibly cheaper way out and just open a dispute on the grounds that the item is not working properly.  All that will cost is the postage with tracking back to the seller.

If he is really vindictive he can report the seller to the authorities for selling fakes after he has his money back.

Message 19 of 29
Latest reply

Re: Can I win this counterfeit case?

If you are able to locate a service centre that provides brand authorised service support to Audio-Technica products and take your purchased product in ask for a written quote to service your product on the basis it is authentic, but it has faults - you may have a chance of obtaining required verification that item is authentic or not as well as the information in written form that will satisfy the requirements of pursuing a paypal claim, and reporting seller if it is not real deal 

 

Message 20 of 29
Latest reply