@esayaf wrote:
Thank you Lyndal. I apologise fully for my anger but I was a little irked by the condescending tone of your first reply.
As I use the app I doubt I will get an updated tracking number because he has refused to upload the initial number for it to link up.
I have already politely informed him that the number is wrong link.
As it is a seventy four kilometre return journey to access a computer in my "local" library I guess I'll just be waiting like an idiot until it turns up
No need to wait like an idiot, although you could if you wanted to, I'll take a stab at this. Using my not so super powers I am guessing your package has arrived at Erlanger, and has been there for a day now. As for when you get another tracking number from PB . . . . . that' would just be guessing and beyond the capabilities of my super powers.
Spoiler
if the second set of numbers has 5 instead of 4 numbers, then trial and error tracking by removing one number from the second set of numbers reveals the following (which my super powers says is probably your correct tracking number because removal of each of the other 4 numbers one by one gives invalid tracking numbers): 
Spoiler
is condescending the buzz word of the day? Is my asking this question in itself condescending? For the record, I didn't find your seller's message nor lyndal's post condescending. Your responses and the expectation that we would some how know you were using the App . . . . . well . . . . . that's for others to decide!
I thought condescending was a Greek guy going downstairs
But what do I know? 
@imastawka wrote:I thought condescending was a Greek guy going downstairs
But what do I know?
Just what this thread needs....a good laugh.
Thanks slr....I think I will keep me granny bloomers hidden under the cape otherwise it might be too much of a shock to others.
As you can see we do have the ability to enjoy ourselves while answering questions.
I just had to give myself mouth to mouth after choking on my mints 
Bear can't bloody spell
