Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 21-10-2009 09:09 PM
As I have said else where, I don't agree with Dorothy Johnstons attribution of this label to John Barnard Knight, a Melbourne potter associated with the label Janet Grey. I, (and others, not having come to this conclusion in isolation, I have talked to various collectors), believe there is a connection with Delamere Art Pottery from Sydney; whether this was a label attached to their wares sold through a certain outlet or a range they sold themselves similarly to Diana's Hollywood or Pate's Regent labels no one is sure.







Anyway - here are some photos for you to see labels on various CAW pieces that have always been attributed to Delamere (except the Koalas which are attributed only to CAW and the frog in the 1st pic which has a Delamere sticker). Aside from this there is continuity of glaze colour, and various motifs common over CAW and Delamere attributed pieces I can post pics of as well if anyone is interested, to support this theory.
Hoping there are some other CAW/Delamere collectors reading who might have info to share
cheers
Rae
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 22-10-2009 12:21 AM
Fantastic ! At last a real subject for debate and one that I agree upon so strongly. You are so correct as there is no evidence available to dispute that Delamere/ CAW were made by the same pottery.
Rather there is hear'say about JB Knight making Classic Pottery but no actual refference to CAW at all.
This evidence is all too flimsy and incorrect.
Classic is Sydney made pottery and quite common here and the variety is rich and wide. I love both of these potteries and I hope that you can find proof and find evidence from family or friends of anyone who worked there to tell the real story,
Cheers,
koori
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-10-2009 08:35 PM
looks like a topic that isn't raising much interest 🙂 I guess you have to be obsessive collectors of CAW like us to get enthusiastic lol!
cheers
Rae
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-10-2009 10:28 PM
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 24-10-2009 08:21 AM
I guess we will just have to talk amongst ourselves LOL,
Cheers,
pip
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 24-10-2009 09:45 AM
Yesterday, the OH bought a few pieces of pottery, one is a koala that is pretty much a match for the bottom one pictured above except ours only has 2 gum leaves not 3. There are no makers marks on the base. Another piece is a kiwi, looks like it could be out of the same pottery, once again not marked, then there is a little handled bowl. If you would like I can post some pictures.
Wilma
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 24-10-2009 09:46 AM
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 24-10-2009 11:25 AM





The backstamp on the little bowl thingy is not quite readable, just an outline of what looks a bit like an open fronted shed!!!. The fox is a piece we have had for a while, the other 3 pieces all came from the same owner.
Wilma
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 24-10-2009 12:17 PM
The Koala is certainly Classic art Ware and as they were all hand finished the leaves & gum nuts vary in number and position on the pieces.
The kiwi looks lovely and I would love to see the base if possible?
The Fox is cute as can be but I have no idea of it's origins.
The vase I have seen before and I think it is by Scott Ceramics from memory...but that plays up at times 😄 but from the mark that you describe I am not so sure,
Regards,
Pip
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 24-10-2009 02:12 PM
Love the eye candy pics
thanks
Jo
