Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 21-10-2009 09:09 PM
As I have said else where, I don't agree with Dorothy Johnstons attribution of this label to John Barnard Knight, a Melbourne potter associated with the label Janet Grey. I, (and others, not having come to this conclusion in isolation, I have talked to various collectors), believe there is a connection with Delamere Art Pottery from Sydney; whether this was a label attached to their wares sold through a certain outlet or a range they sold themselves similarly to Diana's Hollywood or Pate's Regent labels no one is sure.







Anyway - here are some photos for you to see labels on various CAW pieces that have always been attributed to Delamere (except the Koalas which are attributed only to CAW and the frog in the 1st pic which has a Delamere sticker). Aside from this there is continuity of glaze colour, and various motifs common over CAW and Delamere attributed pieces I can post pics of as well if anyone is interested, to support this theory.
Hoping there are some other CAW/Delamere collectors reading who might have info to share
cheers
Rae
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 12:38 PM
The item I mentioned is very similar to this one:-
http://southernantiques.net.au/ceramics.html
Only diff is:- instead of rabbits and mushrooms, it has a koala on one side, and a puppy on the other. The tree trunk looks very similar with gumleafs and gumnuts. The signature is either DE / ED....:)
Talking about the kookaburra which has ended a few days back, was this item Delamere / Classic Art?
Cheers..Brenton
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 01:14 PM

Terri
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 01:18 PM
If you mean the little kooka on the tree stump Kat bought - it is CAW, same as the koalas. If you go back to post #10 you will see mine with some of the koalas.
cheers
Rae
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 03:30 PM
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 03:42 PM
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 03:49 PM
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 03:50 PM

Terri
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 04:42 PM
The Rabbit ashtray that Terri has kindly put a picture of is not Wembley and it will be signed either Beatty or Beauty? I am still not sure if these were from 2 different potteries or if we have another CAW Delamere situation here.
They are not often signed compared to how many are out there to be found. They made most of the pieces with the Gnomes and other small creatures attached to them and come in many shapes and sizes,
Cheers,
Pip
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 05:05 PM
Re: Classic Art Ware - Debateable origins
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Report Inappropriate Content
on 23-05-2010 05:09 PM
