on 01-04-2015 07:41 AM
What's that? 18? 19 this year alone?
I can't fathom why the government (and society) isn't attacking this situation head on? Is it because these are women?
This one didn't even make front page news. The cricket win did.
on 01-04-2015 10:12 AM
@lloydslights wrote:Okay, but I wonder how many of those who died, sought any legal advice prior.
DEB
WHY?
What difference does it make to you if they did seek legal advice or were too afraid to or didn't know where to turn to for help?
It's not only legal services that have had funding slashed. The financial support states receive to fund DV crisis centres is under the axe too.
on 01-04-2015 10:37 AM
@lloydslights wrote:Okay, but I wonder how many of those who died, sought any legal advice prior.
DEB
The reason the funding to the legal entities was restored was because it was found that a third of all cases handled by legal teams related to helping people (particularly women) who were victims of domestic violence.
Many of these women don't have access to money and lawyers. Many of them don't know their legal rights in particular in regards to finances, assets and custody of their children. It is often those 3 things that keep women tied to these men.
01-04-2015 10:41 AM - edited 01-04-2015 10:42 AM
@lloydslights wrote:I realize the need for legal services for domestic violence. And frankly, I believe the funding is more to pay for the wages of lawyers, advocates, etc than for actual victims. And appears to be more for after the event.
The question I have, is what can be done to prevent the violence in the first place. I don't have the answer.
DEB
The only thing that will prevent this is education. And sadly the cuts in this area have not been restored.
Education and advocacy is the area the government should have been putting MORE money into and instead they removed it altogether.
I suspect that the restoration to legal funding is because Brandis is a lawyer himself so understood the plight of not having funding to help a client.
on 01-04-2015 12:54 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye3INqFaXT0 . . . . . . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hv65OYKoy_4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9h-sJzIZ7Q . . . . . . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4MBH_v87M8
I won't say had she been armed, this could have been prevented, theres no way to know, but, id like her chances better.
Suzanna Gratia Hupp- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1u0Byq5Qis
On October 16, 1991, Hennard drove his 1987 Ford Ranger pickup truck through the front window of a Luby's Cafeteria at 1705 East Central Texas Expressway in Killeen, yelled "This is what Bell County has done to me!", then opened fire on the restaurant's patrons and staff with a Glock 17 pistol and later a Ruger P89. About 80 people were in the restaurant at the time. He stalked, shot, and killed 23 people and wounded another 20 before committing suicide. During the shooting, he approached Suzanna Gratia Hupp and her parents. Hupp had actually brought a handgun to the Luby's Cafeteria that day, but had left it in her vehicle due to the laws in force at the time, forbidding citizens from carrying firearms.
Massacre survivor defends gun rights- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwadYRL_vVg
Brooke Baldwin talks to Suzanna Hupp who defends her right to carry a gun. Hupp survived the 1991 Luby's shooting.
----------------------------------------------
I can't fathom why the government (and society) isn't attacking this situation head on? Is it because these are women? This one didn't even make front page news. The cricket win did.
Is that supposed to be a joke? The news probibly played it down because this woman, and other victims men included, have been made vunrable by the government who can't protect them every minute of their day throught their lives even if this government had nothing but good intentions. Here it's mostly football that takes presidence with the news.
Boycott NFL- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb_CAQT2ZIA
.
on 01-04-2015 01:01 PM
@lloydslights wrote:Okay, but I wonder how many of those who died, sought any legal advice prior.
DEB
How many (victims of domestic violence) didn't die, because they used advocacy services (funding to remain cut) and sought legal aid?
Women's Domestic Violence Court Advocacy Services help women and children obtain legal protection from domestic violence and also help with other needs including accessing support services and legal advice. WDVCASs service 108 local courts across NSW.
http://www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au/for-lawyers/resources-and-tools/domestic-violence
on 01-04-2015 01:06 PM
@softail-joanie wrote:
I won't say had she been armed, this could have been prevented, theres no way to know, but, id like her chances better.
.
Joannie, please read the thread before spamming it with youtube videos.
This discussion is specifically about domestic violence in Australia. It is not the place for the promotion of your views about gun laws.
on 01-04-2015 01:14 PM
This discussion is specifically about domestic violence in Australia
that only tells me that you didn't look at anything in the first 4 videos, All Australia
on 01-04-2015 01:15 PM
@lloydslights wrote:Okay, but I wonder how many of those who died, sought any legal advice prior.
DEB
Tara Costigan did.
But it can be revealed that Ms Costigan sought the help of the court system to protect her against Rappel on Friday, just one day before the alleged murder.
An interim domestic violence order – designed to immediately protect those at risk from further violence – was granted by the court.
on 01-04-2015 02:13 PM
@softail-joanie wrote:This discussion is specifically about domestic violence in Australia
that only tells me that you didn't look at anything in the first 4 videos, All Australia
Nope, I didn't. The comment about guns making a difference was the decider for me not to.
on 01-04-2015 02:20 PM
And can you imagine how high the incident of murder would be if these households had a gun within the reach of men who so far are only resorting to physical violence?