on 14-02-2014 05:37 PM
In my view there is a vast difference between passionate debate (heated discussion) and interpersonal dispute.
I agree that interpersonal anything should be given the chop but discussions that adhere to the rules of debate and address the issue are NOT interpersonal in their nature
Without debate society would still be in the cave.
Moderators may I make a suggestion? ............Thank you.
Do not be too hasty in your judgement as to what constitutes an "Interpersonal Dispute".
In a lot of cases interpersonal disputes are veiled so as to appear innocent the do not get the proper treatment that they so richly deserve. I realise that Lithum moderators are only noobies to this site and are not aware of the forum dynamics as yet, let us hope that the learning curve gets accelerated as time passes.
on 15-02-2014 07:43 AM
'quip pro quo'
on 15-02-2014 12:47 PM
on 15-02-2014 12:50 PM
try it without the fez
on 15-02-2014 12:55 PM
on 15-02-2014 01:01 PM
I'm going to "Sergent Schultz" it for this thread, havn't saved enough spending money for another holiday yet.
on 15-02-2014 01:08 PM
I wonder if you can say **bleep**in from Oliver Twist. Surely Charles Dickens wasn't that naughty.
on 15-02-2014 01:09 PM
Oh well. At least I could type Dickens.
on 15-02-2014 01:13 PM
you cannot mention dick or jerry van **bleep**
on 15-02-2014 01:15 PM
I was going to comment then but thought better of it
on 15-02-2014 01:22 PM
Perhaps there are too many guidelines?