on 23-01-2014 08:40 PM
I just saw Current Affair where they showed a car turn left into two cyclist. The car had his left indicator on - looked like he was travelling at very slow speed - the cyclist overtook the car on the car's left and he turned left into them. Was it his fault or the cyclist who overtook on the car's left?
They were talking about making a '0ne meter' law. I cannot see how this will work on many roads. To keep one meter away while overtaking a cyclist or group of cyclist would put you over the centre line in many cases - risking a head on collision??? It would be OK when there is a separate lane but SO MANY roads do not have enough room for it.
Opinions on this rule?? How would it work? Opinions on the Current Affair accident?
on 23-01-2014 09:10 PM
Is there a link to the footage as I did not see it.
on
23-01-2014
09:16 PM
- last edited on
26-01-2014
11:53 AM
by
pixie-six
@love*today wrote:
Lmao.....well like has been said it's been in qld and it works....it's not hard
Hahahahahaha
15ks? Slow rider....was it a child that you passed within a metre because you were scared of cars behind you?
I'm in Qld. I didn't pass anyone - I am just asking about the program.
what's with the 'lmao' and the 'Hahahahahaha'?
23-01-2014 09:17 PM - edited 23-01-2014 09:17 PM
dunno I would google it but my bandwdth on satellite at the moment is about as wide as this full stop .
However I agree with the 1 metre rule in principle as long as it is RECIPROCAL ie
CYCLISTS MUST STAY 1 METRE AWAY FROM VEHICLES AND NOT UNDERTAKE IN BUILT UP AREAS
OR NEAR DRIVEWAYS UNLESS THE LANE IS VACANT
on 23-01-2014 09:20 PM
on 23-01-2014 09:21 PM
I'll restate -
The car had his left indicator on - WHY? to show everyone he was turning LEFT - and yet the cyclists chose to undertake the car anyway.
=the cyclists passed the car on the car's LEFT = ILLEGAL - if it had been a motorcyclist passing on the left they would have been booked, so if the cyclists wish to be treated equally on the roads, they should follow the same rules as everyone else.
on 23-01-2014 09:23 PM - last edited on 25-01-2014 06:41 PM by li.vish
.ummmm your the one scared of a "6" car pile up because you might have to give a cyclist some space for safety reasons!
You do know a car can easily KILL a cyclist who is legally using a shared road?
on 23-01-2014 09:25 PM
on 23-01-2014 09:26 PM
@love*today wrote:
Mental problems......ummmm your the one scared of a "6" car pile up because you might have to give a cyclist some space for safety reasons!
You do know a car can easily KILL a cyclist who is legally using a shared road?
as long as the cyclist IS LEGALLY USING the road - see my post above - the cyclist should be goverened by the same road rules as everyone else.
No-one is asking you to give up you bicycle - just use it LEGALLY like the rest of us have to.
on 23-01-2014 09:29 PM
come to think of it, I saw a program the other day about cyclist in the city breaking red-light rules, pedestrian crossing rules and many more and they complain when they get knoecked a-over-t.
By the way, my BIL rides professionally in Europe and UK.
on 23-01-2014 09:30 PM