on โ20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on โ26-12-2014 12:23 PM
@aps1080 wrote:
What a sorry lot you are, spending your Christmas Day posting on this thread !!!
There was a grand total of 4 posts posted by 4 individuals on this thread yesterday so please explain how that equates to "spending Christmas Day posting on this thread".
Too funny coming from one of the most prolific posters posting on Christmas Day :D:D:D
on โ26-12-2014 12:32 PM
@debra9275 wrote:
Send her a card to cheer her up Julia, she looks sad throughout the whole message from start to finish
One whole page on this? Seriously, LOL
One whole hilarious page ๐
An investigation that only Jack Reacher could solve.
on โ26-12-2014 12:36 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:
you asked why margie looked so sad.
you could have simply said thank you when
someone gave you the answer.
not sure why you dont believe me
the beginning of the video at 0:01
at 00.02
and the sad face at 00:26
and finally, from your link:
But whatโs got Mrs Abbott looking so glum?
The couple paid tribute to families spending Christmas apart and those grieving for relatives in his annual Christmas message.
Mr Abbott said that while Christmas was a joyous occasion for many, it could be a sad time for some.
โThis year, we are thinking of those families who have lost loved ones,โ he said in a statement on Wednesday.
Itโs been a tragic year for Australians in the news and while the Abbottโs donโt make any particular references, like the loss of 36 Australian citizens and residents in the MH17 tragedy or the recent siege in Martin Place, for some families it is no doubt a โsad time tooโ, as Mrs Abbott says.
masterfully done.
on โ26-12-2014 12:39 PM
@j*oono wrote:
@debra9275 wrote:
Send her a card to cheer her up Julia, she looks sad throughout the whole message from start to finish
One whole page on this? Seriously, LOLOne whole hilarious page ๐
An investigation that only Jack Reacher could solve.
considering the solution to this mystery was
in Debra's link
But whatโs got Mrs Abbott looking so glum?
The couple paid tribute to families spending Christmas apart and those grieving for relatives in his annual Christmas message.
Mr Abbott said that while Christmas was a joyous occasion for many, it could be a sad time for some.
โThis year, we are thinking of those families who have lost loved ones,โ he said in a statement on Wednesday.
Itโs been a tragic year for Australians in the news and while the Abbottโs donโt make any particular references, like the loss of 36 Australian citizens and residents in the MH17 tragedy or the recent siege in Martin Place, for some families it is no doubt a โsad time tooโ, as Mrs Abbott says.
on โ26-12-2014 12:39 PM
@debra9275 wrote:
Lol. I have no idea and I'm not watching it again.
Did you know that the last word is not necessarily the best word ๐
I'll leave you to have a good think about the video and maybe you can chat with others about it
gotta go off for a ride with someone have you Deb?
on โ26-12-2014 12:43 PM
Why do some people have to take such a nice gesture and try to make a mockery of it?
โ26-12-2014 12:49 PM - edited โ26-12-2014 12:51 PM
on โ26-12-2014 12:53 PM
How so! I had already done all my Christmas donations. I'm not knocking yours. Ours was the charity of our choice, which I did.
on โ26-12-2014 01:00 PM
on โ26-12-2014 01:02 PM
@j*oono wrote:How so! I had already done all my Christmas donations. I'm not knocking yours. Ours was the charity of our choice, which I did.
Ok. I think it was a bit insensitive to post how many charities you supported overseas and then post that you were all uncharitied out when it came to aussies in need, that's all.
Maybe I was just being a tad oversensitive.