on 20-04-2014 10:21 PM
As it's more than 100 days now, it has been suggested that a new thread was needed. The current govt has been breaking promises and telling lies at a rate so fast it's hard to keep up.
This below is worrying, "independent" pffft, as if your own doctor is somehow what? biased, it's ridiculous. So far there is talk of only including people under a certain age 30-35, for now. Remember that if your injured in a car, injured at work or get ill, you too might need to go on the DSP. They have done a similar think in the UK with devastating consequences.
and this is the 2nd time recently where the Govt has referred to work as welfare???? So when you go to work tomorrow (or tuesday), just remember that's welfare.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-20/disability-pensioners-may-be-reassessed-kevin-andrews/5400598
Independent doctors could be called in to reassess disability pensioners, Federal Government says
The Federal Government is considering using independent doctors to examine disability pensioners and assess whether they should continue to receive payments.
Currently family doctors provide reports supporting claims for the Disability Support Pension (DSP).
But Social Services Minister Kevin Andrews is considering a measure that would see independent doctors reassess eligibility.
"We are concerned that where people can work, the best form of welfare is work," Mr Andrews said at a press conference.
on 15-05-2015 05:35 PM
Thanks Glee, I didn't realize he'd won his appeal. Trumped up charge anyway when you compare it to the rorting of others still in politics
15-05-2015 05:53 PM - edited 15-05-2015 05:54 PM
@monman12 wrote:" Chuckle!
Indeed it is actually really quite difficult to get any original comments from some regarding the news of the day. Lots of C&Ps of others comments, but a dearth of originality!
haha! Not from you obviously!
Oh I am crushed. However, I do appreciate the efforts to post without the safety net of a C&P. Practice will help a lot over time.
@gleee58 wrote:
The chuckle is so appropriate in this post.
The irony of a bunch of over used unoriginal images that have spammed the thread for months to attack other poster for their lack of originality is too funny for words. :D:D:D:D:D:D:D
10 kudo's
plus
x 5
15-05-2015 06:20 PM - edited 15-05-2015 06:23 PM
I completely overlooked Slipper's appeal win I must admit..
"Thanks Glee, I didn't realize he'd won his appeal. Trumped up charge anyway when you compare it to the rorting of others still in politics" (or the others out of politics like Craig Thomson, or the jailed past President of the ALP Williamson)
How exactly can a charge, laid by the Australian Federal Police, be trumped up?
In the appeal Justice Burns said one flaw in the case was that two material witnesses were not called. ... Justice Burns said the prosecution should have called them, to shed light on whether he was on parliamentary business or not.
G58: "The irony of a bunch of over used unoriginal images that have spammed the thread for months to attack other poster for their lack of originality is too funny for words."
Irony?, unoriginal? We would appear to use somewhat different lexicons, especially if you are alluding to:
or
or
or
or
or
(animals copied)
I would assert that they actually are true originals, as for Irony in their use, "chuckle is so appropriate"
I will conclude with another "original" siggy produced by a poster from CW days, David.
on 15-05-2015 06:38 PM
http://link.foreignpolicy.com/view/53a6bbe59d27848d080001372lqca.uqm/49052b68
how weird is this??
I read it last night but didn't want to post it here until I saw something in our media about it
when questioned on it abbott said that the U.S. official had mis-spoken
on 15-05-2015 06:46 PM
@debra9275 wrote:http://link.foreignpolicy.com/view/53a6bbe59d27848d080001372lqca.uqm/49052b68
how weird is this??
It's incredible stuff, Deb. How could such a senior official get it so wrong? Or maybe he didn't get it wrong and let slip some embarrassing truths (sorry for sounding like a conspiracy theorist).
on 15-05-2015 06:51 PM
G58: "The irony of a bunch of over used unoriginal images that have spammed the thread for months to attack other poster for their lack of originality is too funny for words."
Irony?, unoriginal?
I am on a roll now, and have dug up some more siggies / avatars made for me in the past by some in CW . Perhaps I should use them in turn when responding to the political malodorous C&P twitter herein.
That is from Kylie (1st dolphin lady) It is an original G58. and represents "myself" with angel wings surrounded by warm, cuddly, and nice things, I am also holding the VB (vomit bucket) needed back then (and now perhaps) for some of the then occasional posts.
J
on 15-05-2015 07:00 PM
They're hardly original when used multiple times a day for months.
15-05-2015 07:03 PM - edited 15-05-2015 07:05 PM
I was wondering whether it's slipped out "too early" iykwim Cros, to say that a US official has it 'wrong' is incredible imo
time will tell
15-05-2015 07:05 PM - edited 15-05-2015 07:06 PM
why am I suddenly reminded of the way Bronwyn Bishop doesn't allow people to speak
( I am not referring to you or Cros here btw Gleee)
on 15-05-2015 07:30 PM
@monman12 wrote:I completely overlooked Slipper's appeal win I must admit..
"Thanks Glee, I didn't realize he'd won his appeal. Trumped up charge anyway when you compare it to the rorting of others still in politics" (or the others out of politics like Craig Thomson, or the jailed past President of the ALP Williamson)
How exactly can a charge, laid by the Australian Federal Police, be trumped up?
It was trumped up in the way it was dealt with. All members of Parliament have the right under the Minchin convention to repay allowances.
Slipper was refused that option. Someone fromt he LNP made a complaint to the AFP so he could not repay the amount, which was roughly ten times less than Abbott has been allowed to repay.
The Thomson case should also be reviewed after what has come to light about his enemies.