on 05-09-2015 09:50 PM
I THOUGHT I was a Christian but my Leaders are telling me I have to HATE those less fortunate than me!
I THOUGHT Jesus wanted me to Love & support those less fortunate than I,
BUT...
on 06-09-2015 05:11 PM
The verdict
Mr Morrison is correct.
Based on the definition set out in the people smuggling protocol, people who have come to Australia without a valid visa have illegally entered the country.
That is the case even though these people have not committed any crime, nor broken any Australian or international law.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-09-06/morrison-correct-illegal-entry-people/4935372
on 06-09-2015 05:12 PM
"What it doesn't deal with is someone hopping on a plane from (the Iranian capital) Tehran, going to Indonesia ... and then hopping on a vessel to come across and do the two day trip (to Australia) and classing themselves as a refugee.''
If someone can find the money to do that, does that mean their claim to be a refugee cannot be genuine?
Were the Jews who paid large amounts of money for passages aboard the Struma and the St Louis not genuine refugees?
on 06-09-2015 05:31 PM
on 06-09-2015 05:33 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:"What it doesn't deal with is someone hopping on a plane from (the Iranian capital) Tehran, going to Indonesia ... and then hopping on a vessel to come across and do the two day trip (to Australia) and classing themselves as a refugee.''
If someone can find the money to do that, does that mean their claim to be a refugee cannot be genuine?
ask mr husic.
he would have a better understanding of
immigration laws BUT it is my understanding
that when you escape persecution, you would
not have valid passports and visas to travel
across countries and then destroy those
documents to conceal your motives.
i think that is what mr husic was getting at.
there has been a lot of talk about closing the
refugee convention loophole.
your reference to the jews in wwii is an example
of why the geneva convention is seen as not
relevant to the current refugee situation.
on 06-09-2015 09:49 PM
Speak for yourself do not presume to speak for others who vehemently disagree with your hypothesis.
on 07-09-2015 12:50 AM
@djlukjilly wrote:Speak for yourself do not presume to speak for others who vehemently disagree with your hypothesis.
I don't need to speak for you. Your mindset comes across loud and clear in every post you make.
on 07-09-2015 09:00 AM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@djlukjilly wrote:Speak for yourself do not presume to speak for others who vehemently disagree with your hypothesis.
I don't need to speak for you. Your mindset comes across loud and clear in every post you make.
As does yours.
on 07-09-2015 09:23 AM
Hi everyone,
Please remember to keep your replies civil and courteous towards one another. Feel free to review the Discussion Boards Usage Policies if needed.
Thanks for your cooperation.
Varia
Community Moderator
on 07-09-2015 09:46 AM
Thanks for that very good response and have a lovely day. 🙂
on 07-09-2015 12:04 PM
@djlukjilly wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@djlukjilly wrote:Speak for yourself do not presume to speak for others who vehemently disagree with your hypothesis.
I don't need to speak for you. Your mindset comes across loud and clear in every post you make.
As does yours.
Well of course - I woudn't bother posting if I didn't have a point to make.