on 13-01-2014 12:06 PM
on 13-01-2014 03:56 PM
he's even more popular than on election eve
oh much much more
the loony leftwing losers are flocking in droves to the right side
on 13-01-2014 03:57 PM
@lurker17260 wrote:
"I'm not hearing many complaints about him at all, apart from Paid-to-Posts flooding free online platforms"
I think they must have lost my address. I haven't been receiving any cheques.
Will that end your support?
on 13-01-2014 06:29 PM
13-01-2014 06:33 PM - edited 13-01-2014 06:34 PM
@polocross58 wrote:.
I'm not hearing many complaints about him at all, apart from Paid-to-Posts flooding free online platforms
Basically, it seems Abbott and Co are tackling many of the issues the average citizen would seek to fix, were they in a position to do so
So yes, it looks as if Abbott is at least as popular now as when LNP took power. And very likely he's even more popular than on election eve
sorry, but an oldies publication has an over representation of angry cranks. that figure is as reliable as james ashby.
on
13-01-2014
06:34 PM
- last edited on
13-01-2014
06:52 PM
by
underbat
on 13-01-2014 06:40 PM
on 13-01-2014 06:41 PM
@freakiness wrote:
@monman12 wrote:FN: "At least Donna's posts are not full of hate filled diatribe plagiarised from some News Corp hack or blogger. "
@However FN I have noticed that DY's posts are also often not full of loving facts, or any indication that research is considered important, somewhat like a member in the past who apropos Telstra wrote:
"Telstra agreed. They signed an agreement, They negotiated a good deal. They were not forced. They made the business decision to work with NBN Co before the legislation was debated and passed."
I do like historical fictional drama though, and so some of DY's threads are also worth a chuckle or two especially when (as is normal), they stir the entrenched matriarch flock into furious PPTSD action.
The only fury is from the Ackerman and Pickering fans.
But thanks, you have just really enlightened me about the nature of the person you are by throwing around comments made on another thread some time ago.
Akerman & Pickering seem to be your favourites to demonize, along with any right wing person on here.
So you read them every day? so you should know what you are talking about eh?
For someone who seems to "hate" those 2 journalists to the extent that you do then why would you read tham at all? or are they just handy whipping boys to prop up your own weak arguments.
Interesting question.
on 13-01-2014 06:43 PM
@freakiness wrote:
@nero_wulf wrote:
We have waited all morning for our mandatory daily Tony Abbott 1 line bashing thread...
Thank you for not disappointing the faithful with your post, it will be appreciated by them and I am sure it will make for a lively and informatitive one sided discussion..... :0 🙂
🙂
At least Donna's posts are not full of hate filled diatribe plagiarised from some News Corp hack or blogger.
Do you ever read your own posts??? "hate filled" "diatribe" "plagiarised" "hack" "blogger"?? no.....hmmmmm
on 13-01-2014 06:47 PM
My thoughts exactly silverfaun.....
on 13-01-2014 06:52 PM