The virus moves because people move it.
If people stop moving the virus dies.
That's all there is to it.
Which is why we are at the stage we are now because people refuse to stop moving,ships were passengers
allowed in and further cases would come from flights coming in and they have to self isolate but need to get
home first and get supplies so will be active before they can isolate.
@go-tazz wrote:The virus moves because people move it.
If people stop moving the virus dies.
Ok,so I'm not religious but why do they always seem to be exempt from the same rules others have to abide by?
Beyond those essential reasons for leaving the home, the Government has provided a list which would "excuse" somebody being outside.
It includes:
- Fleeing an unsafe home, so to avoid injury or illness
- Dealing with an emergency or on compassionate grounds
- Providing care or helping a vulnerable relative/person
- Taking your child to childcare
- Attending a wedding (adhering to the five-person limit) or a funeral (adhering to a 10-person limit)
- Moving house or moving between two places of residence
- Donating blood
- Fulfilling legal obligations
- Accessing support services such as employment services, mental services etc
- Fulfilling parental sharing arrangements of children (the Government says those conditions shouldn't change and children can move between homes)
- Going to a place of worship or to provide pastoral care, if you are a priest, minister or member of a religious order.
That would would/could be interpreted as including everyone and as they generaly congregate in enclosed areas the risk of transmission would/could be increased.
@go-tazz wrote:
@go-tazz wrote:The virus moves because people move it.
If people stop moving the virus dies.
Ok,so I'm not religious but why do they always seem to be exempt from the same rules others have to abide by?
- Going to a place of worship or to provide pastoral care, if you are a priest, minister or member of a religious order.
That would would/could be interpreted as including everyone and as they generaly congregate in enclosed areas the risk of transmission would/could be increased.
No, a Follower is not a Member and every church round here is closed . Members would include nuns, monks, lamas, etc those appointed within the rules of their Order. And they are not exempt from all the regulations either.
nG!!nU~$(KGrHgoOKi8EjlLm(rUzBKcZn2z!7Q~~_7.JPG "*kazumi*"){kind=avatar}
@springyzone wrote:
- Going to a place of worship or to provide pastoral care, if you are a priest, minister or member of a religious order.
That would would/could be interpreted as including everyone and as they generally congregate in enclosed areas the risk of transmission would/could be increased.
-----------------------------
My interpretation of that is like Brighton's. Only priests, ministers, nuns, rabbis, people like that, who would be considered members of a religious order.I didn't take that condition to apply to all members of a congregation, only the actual ordained ministers.
All churches are shut at the moment as far as general services go, but a minister might be asked, for example, to officiate at a wedding or funeral or visit a dying person in hospital as part of their duties.
That's why I originally stated that I'm not religious so don't have a clue how it works and I Kudo'd their post as I
then understood that a member is not termed as a follower as to me a member is someone that's part of
something like a club,etc.
The only people that I've come across that are religious have also stated that they are a member of that
particular church so hence the confusion.
