on โ26-05-2013 09:09 PM
on โ27-05-2013 02:32 PM
I am not anti vaccine but am pro choice.
And by your own admission you have chosen not to vaccinate.
What effect to you think it would have on the childhood mortality rate if everyone else made the same choice?
on โ27-05-2013 02:40 PM
huh? own admission? really she ele.....you need to read more carefully? my children were vaccinated minus the whooping cough due to a severe reaction where I thought my son may die. pro choice does not mean oneis anti vaccination *sigh*
I am not anti vaccine but am pro choice.
And by your own admission you have chosen not to vaccinate.
What effect to you think it would have on the childhood mortality rate if everyone else made the same choice?
on โ27-05-2013 02:44 PM
How do they test for immunity, twinkles? is it a blood test, or less invasive?
on โ27-05-2013 02:49 PM
blood test was the norm Karen
on โ27-05-2013 03:03 PM
I wouldn't mind getting myself checked... my jabs might have worked off. Also my son, because he skipped one jab ... measles I think... due to a high temp on the previous. I'll have to book a surprise appointment for him when he next visits lol ๐
on โ27-05-2013 07:23 PM
The debate re vaccine and autism is on going with good indication that vaccines may trigger itin SOME.
BS.
The debate is well and truly dead in the water. Why you would continue to propalgate misinformation is beyond me and shows how uninformed you are on the topic.
on โ27-05-2013 07:43 PM
blinkes much!
on โ27-05-2013 07:56 PM
Blinkers? Me? Lol.
I am neither anti nor for vaccination. I understand that some people are unable to vaccinate their children although those incidences would be rare. And I am still waiting for you to explain how your son almost died specifically from vaccination medication. I am also waiting for you to point me in the direction of proof where you said something along the lines of "...and another 6 children died around the same time...". Just point me in the direction and I will find the information myself because I have searched and searched and come up with nothing.
However, as I noted on the other thread on the same topic (not sure why another thread was necessary), there have been an enormous amount of extensive studies done since 1989 in order to back up Wakefields (now found to be fraudulent) theory that makes a link to autism. But not one study has been able to confirm the his findings.
You know why?
Because the original study was fabricated.
on โ27-05-2013 08:07 PM
and I repeat I have never read Wakefields reports. So much is out there if you really are interested.
on โ27-05-2013 08:08 PM
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/index.html
Wakefield falsified the research.