i fail to see how mentioning abbotts hair is sexist. it may be irrelevant, like gillards hair. but the threads are not really about hair are they..
perhaps you ought to just lift your game ? supporters will emerge if you do.. not that more c and p will help mind, you need someone to say something of real substance rather than just the sloganeering on- a -loop.. that stuff doesn't cut it anywhere else so why should CS be any different ? the posters here are capable of independent thought, why not give it a try ?
|
.
That's a crock.
Any time any opinion on any failed or upcoming disastrous policy of Labors is posted you are the first to comment with inane snide innuendo either about Abbott or going back to Howard, nothing about the op's piece, no relevent argument.
You never really add anything to a thread.
As for c & p, well that's a tool that is highly overused by lab supporters to post endless links & c & p without any opinion of their own.
If a c & p article is posted critisizing a labor policy the source is ridiculed & demeaned or written off as a News LTD hate campaign, regardless of the stature of the journalist who writes it or where it comes from.
I am not the only one who notices the ganging up, the nit picking of any posters opinion, the demand for proof or links, the endless personal snipes, the pm's sent to gather back up to gang up on a poster.
The spelling police who take a common error to then ridicule the poster & nothing about the crux of the subject, they're not interested, all they want is to drive them off.
All this type of behaviour you have to take some of the blame for.
