MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL

WILLIAM WENT MISSING ON SEPT 12TH, 2014 FROM KENDALL, N.S.W- Please share this.. 

10476325_10152530737624755_8746816786387629698_o.jpg

Message 1 of 274
Latest reply
273 REPLIES 273

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL

Most of what I have said is just common sense.  General knowledge in fact.

Message 191 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL


@polksaladallie wrote:

Most of what I have said is just common sense.  General knowledge in fact.


I disagree. We are talking about a specific child abduction in this thread and no one apart from the police and maybe the parents knows exactly what actions have been taken and what else is being investigated at present.

 

 

Message 192 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL

Sheesh.     The 'Miss Marple' thing was a throwaway line.

 

I was in agreement with pepe

 

I'm not getting into a  'blow by blow' argument  discussion.

 

 

 

 

Message 193 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL


@am*3 wrote:

@polksaladallie wrote:

When the public was informed, you mean.

 

The work of that division has nothing to do with any person, it begins investigating imediately.

 

This did not happen in past times, but it does now.

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________-

 

No I don't mean that, I meant (as it read) when the sex crimes squad was deployed/arrived in Kendall.

 

We are all the public here, no one knows anything for sure.  MSM articles are all we have to go on, which have a bit more credibilty than personal assumptions, theories etc.

 


I agree with your last paragraph.  I would never have posted something as in 161.  I don't mention names, and I have an opinion.

 

Nobody but the police knows when the "sex crime squad" arrived or what they had been doing until then.  The public is told things when it is pertinent to be told.

Message 194 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL

I don't believe the police would have any reason to give false information about the sex crime squad arriving. Kendall is a small town, easy for people there to find out who is arriving and who isn't.

 

More importantly those places soon after a crime are crawling with reporters..they aren't blind.

 

 

 

 

Message 195 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL


@am*3 wrote:

@polksaladallie wrote:

Most of what I have said is just common sense.  General knowledge in fact.


I disagree. We are talking about a specific child abduction in this thread and no one apart from the police and maybe the parents knows exactly what actions have been taken and what else is being investigated at present.

 


That's what I have been saying all along.

 

Common sense and general knowledge means that no longer do the police wait to see what happens, they act immediately in missing child cases.  All sections. 

Message 196 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL


@am*3 wrote:

I don't believe the police would have any reason to give false information about the sex crime squad arriving. Kendall is a small town, easy for people there to find out who is arriving and who isn't.

 

More importantly those places soon after a crime are crawling with reporters..they aren't blind.

 


Do they have something written on their shirts?  All detectives look alike to me. 

Message 197 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL

The 2 bald headed guys in suits look like twins.

I have read quite a lot this last 2 weeks about the situation and all I can say is:
Thank goodness every household doesn't have a gun and that we have DNA and real evidence with real investigative groups.
Message 198 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL

Woops..... add....
Like police.
Message 199 of 274
Latest reply

Re: MISSING BOY WILLIAM TYRRELL

Your theory is very possible. If Bill Spedding was at the primary school when WIlliam went missing, he would have had lots of people who would have seen him. However, even if he was there, this is a 'ring' and so it might not have been Bill 'personally'. I also think one has to question why it is that Margaret Spedding has managed to bring up a bunch of children who can't look after their own children. There's something weird about Margaret too - I'm not saying she is in the know regarding all of Bill's actions. They have not been  married for long, but her family all seem to be very dysfunctional and it seems that these people all live with very loose boundaries (to put it mildly!). It's possible that Margaret procures children for her husband. As awful as that thought it, it does happen... I hope that she is just another woman in denial, as it's even harder to accept that women can be a part of this kind of crime. It's just unbelievable to me. However, it is clearly NOT 'unbelievable'. It seems that there are a lot of sexually abused children in this world, and so why are we always so shocked again and again? It's because there should NOT be ANY such children. Oh my god, where is William? It seems impossible that Bill Spedding does not have something to do with William. I mean, if Spedding knows nothing about William, that would have to be one of the most unlikely coincidences ever - I think that the girls that Spedding abused (who are now women) came forward when they heard about Bill being in the vicinity. 

Message 200 of 274
Latest reply