@icyfroth wrote:
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
Because, as a human, I have a carnivores mouth and digestive tract.... not a herbivores.
There are major differences between the two.......humans are designed to eat meat.....so I do....
humans, in fact, are not designed to eat meat:
Are human beings anatomically more similar to natural carnivores or to natural herbivores? Letโs find outโฆ.
- Intestinal tract length. Carnivorous animals have intestinal tracts that are 3-6x their body length, while herbivores have intestinal tracts 10-12x their body length. Human beings have the same intestinal tract ratio as herbivores.
- Stomach acidity. Carnivoresโ stomachs are 20x more acidic than the stomachs of herbivores. Human stomach acidity matches that of herbivores.
- Saliva. The saliva of carnivores is acidic. The saliva of herbivores is alkaline, which helps pre-digest plant foods. Human saliva is alkaline.
- Shape of intestines. Carnivore bowels are smooth, shaped like a pipe, so meat passes through quickly โ they donโt have bumps or pockets. Herbivore bowels are bumpy and pouch-like with lots of pockets, like a windy mountain road, so plant foods pass through slowly for optimal nutrient absorption. Human bowels have the same characteristics as those of herbivores.
- Fiber. Carnivores donโt require fiber to help move food through their short and smooth digestive tracts. Herbivores require dietary fiber to move food through their long and bumpy digestive tracts, to prevent the bowels from becoming clogged with rotting food. Humans have the same requirement as herbivores.
- Cholesterol. Cholesterol is not a problem for a carnivoreโs digestive system. A carnivore such as a cat can handle a high-cholesterol diet without negative health consequences. A human cannot. Humans have zero dietary need for cholesterol because our bodies manufacture all we need. Cholesterol is only found in animal foods, never in plant foods. A plant-based diet is by definition cholesterol-free.
- Claws and teeth. Carnivores have claws, sharp front teeth capable of subduing prey, and no flat molars for chewing. Herbivores have no claws or sharp front teeth capable of subduing prey, but they have flat molars for chewing. Humans have the same characteristics as herbivores.
But arenโt humans anatomically suited to be omnivores?
Nope. We donโt anatomically match up with omnivorous animals anymore than we do with carnivorous ones. Omnivores are more similar to carnivores than they are to herbivores. For a more detailed summary table that compares the properties of carnivores, herbivores, and omnivores side by side, see this page:
Comparative Anatomy & Taxonomy
The link above also debunks the opportunistic feeder theory, which states that because humans can eat like omnivores, that we must therefore be omnivores. And this is of course false because mere behavior doesnโt indicate suitability. There are plenty of things we can do as a species that would threaten our survival if we all considered them suitable default behavior, such as shooting each other, lobbing hand grenades, or sending spam.
.......lol......
Animals that are herbivorous cannot chew or digest meat.......humans have been eating meat for over a million years.......
Roy spencer disagrees. 
he doesn't believe in the "Bae Marie effect'' but his data only dates from 2009 which discredits his theories somewhat .
Because, as a human, I have a carnivores mouth and digestive tract.... not a herbivores.
There are major differences between the two.......humans are designed to eat meat.....so I do....
humans werent originally meat-eaters
our dentures are a quick indication of that, we evolved to eat plants fruit roots vegetation etc
if that was scarce we would adapt and eat a bit of meat to survive,
you would need to read scientific evidence going back say 3 million years to understand this
have you known a tiger (carnivore) use a tooth pick?
