Melbourne Cop chocking and manhandling a girl and arresting her for not wearing a Mask

[joz*garage]

Warning - contains fowl language...

[imastawka]

Sometimes it is 

https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/21/anti-lockdown-protester-branded-covid-19-political-ploy-killed-corona...

[joz*garage]

What's this political jargon you're on about?

I didn't see politics, what i saw in front of me was a mad arrrs-h cop chocking a girl

Dig?

[joz*garage]

---

@not_for_sale2025 wrote:

---

@joz*garage wrote:

So cold, so thoughtless

Lets hope you never experience police brutality

(i have)

---

So have I Joe, during the days when you were dragged off to the cop shop and had to defend yourself against a whole bunch of them. But some of us have to get over it and move on.

We all saw the same video and clearly what you concluded was very different to what I did. "So cold, so thoughtless". Did the treatment of that woman affect you so deeply?

---

I'm surprised it didn't affect anybody else, But Lionrose gets it.

[davewil1964]

---

@imastawka wrote:

Sometimes it is 

https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/21/anti-lockdown-protester-branded-covid-19-political-ploy-killed-corona...

---

here's a few more -

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/people-who-died-from-coronavirus-after-not-taking-it-seriously-20...

[davewil1964]

---

@joz*garage wrote:

What's this political jargon you're on about?

I didn't see politics, what i saw in front of me was a mad arrrs-h cop chocking a girl

Dig?

---

Of course you didn't. What you saw is what you wanted to see. I would, however, recommend you research the difference between 'chocking' and 'choking'.

'My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts' seems to be apt in your case.

[joz*garage]

Fact is you failed to see the brutality of the cop, regardless of the "facts"

And you are delusional if you think grammar nazis win a debate

I come to the conclusion, this is done coz they got nothing else to offer

There-their-they're

[davewil1964]

---

@joz*garage wrote:

Fact is you failed to see the brutality of the cop, regardless of the "facts"

And you are delusional if you think grammar nazis win a debate

I come to the conclusion, this is done coz they got nothing else to offer

There-their-they're

---

Fact is I did.

And the deliberate provocation.

Which it was. Probably why she was the perpetrator rather than her cowardly Nazi boyfriend. It wouldn't have garnered any misguided sympathy if it was him.

[joz*garage]

Justify the cops actions all you want

Judging by his abuse of his authority (choyking), I can make a calculated guess his initial approach to the "girl" was left to be desired, probably down right uncivil 

[davewil1964]

Third time's a curse.

You still have no idea how to spell a word you repeatedly use. 5 seconds on Google would give you the correct spelling. I'm sorry, but your inability to use English doesn't make your point any more relevant, or correct.

I'll try once more -

She provoked the cops;

While her cowardly boyfriend videoed the provoked confrontation;

Which she escalated by assaulting the cops;

All while breaking the law.

It's not hard to understand, and your reaction is exactly what was sought. Thinking people, however, can see through the fabricated scenario to the actual circumstances. Unfortunately, you don't seem to be one.

[joz*garage]

Where's the proof of the initial confrontation? I bet I'm right and this cop didn't act in a cool and calm manner

(But, this kind of thinking eludes you

By the way, I'm sorry you don't understand sarcasm, & lack a sense of humour, I misspelled choking on purpose this time coz it bothers you so much ***sighs

Lighten up